The author Stefan Zweig once wrote that European politics has for centuries been a struggle between two schools of leadership: The common good espoused by humanist Erasmus, and a more self-interested pursuit of power promoted by Machiavelli. It is the former that France desperately needs to embrace if it is going to break the gridlock of a hung parliament and get its economy back on track.
Snap parliamentary elections on Sunday showed French voters are remarkably united on keeping far-right leader Marine Le Pen out of power, but divided on everything else: While Le Pen’s National Rally came third behind a left-wing bloc and French President Emmanuel Macron’s centrists, none of them won a majority. In countries more used to coalition governments, this would be an immediate trigger for compromise and negotiation across the aisle to build bigger partnerships. A moderate Left, Greens and centrists tie-up would potentially be only a few seats short of controlling the legislature.
Instead, what began as House of Cards has become something like an episode of Survivor. The sparring has already begun: Far-left firebrand Jean-Luc Melenchon quickly thundered there would be no compromise on eye-popping wage hikes, wealth taxes and reform rollback, part of a program estimated by think tank Institut Montaigne to add 179 billion euros (US$194 billion) annually to the budget deficit. The rest of his New Popular Front is not so sure.
The Greens’ Marine Tondelier said the risk of economic “catastrophe” should be taken into account. However, the sum total of the past few days is plenty of potential leaders-in-waiting, including the Socialists’ Olivier Faure, but no agreed-upon candidate and no platform.
Instead of accepting that nobody has won, politicians seem to think everyone has — especially those with an eye on presidential elections in 2027. Hence why center-right politicians are now also saying they deserve a chance at forming a government, with former prime minister Edouard Philippe keen to unite them with Macron’s centrists.
Macron, for his part, is trying to buy time by calling for a coalition of pro-European forces to keep the extremes at bay. This makes sense for the time being, given the importance of a successful Olympic Games and the speed at which the Left is tearing itself apart.
However, Macron must know the glue keeping his bloc together is not durable either, with deepening divisions between its left-leaning and right-leaning members. Neither is peace on the streets, where some of Melenchon’s allies hope to apply pressure in an ominous echo of former US president Donald Trump’s “stop the steal.”
Party leaders need to put the cloak and dagger away and think of the common good. The Left alliance, which has declared itself the biggest force in parliament, should be the first to do so by starting from basic principles. One is acknowledging that yesterday’s manifestos are destined for the shredder: It is totally unrealistic to imagine a minority Left government could push through its existing program at a time when credit-rating firms and the EU have put Paris in the budget naughty corner. Another is that the aim of compromise is to build a coalition, which is the only way to govern sustainably.
The third is that any party that does not want to build a coalition — which seems to apply to Melenchon’s France Unbowed — should make it clear and accept the consequences.
The longer this mess drags on, the greater the risk of lost growth, lost investment and lost faith in democracy — all good news for Le Pen, who is biding her time and who clearly remains the politician to beat in 2027 even as she faces a new campaign-finance probe. France has a huge task addressing issues like productivity, purchasing power, demographic decline and the bloated size of its state.
No one person can lead France out of its crisis — and maybe, for a while, that is no bad thing.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s