Officials must uphold the law
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Mach Ngoc Tran (麥玉珍) said her family has a 10-hectare farm for growing coffee beans and fruit trees in her hometown in Vietnam. As Vietnam only had white dragon fruit, she only had her first taste of the red variety when she came to Taiwan decades ago.
She said she was so amazed at the time that she took seeds and cuttings of red dragon fruit and smuggled them into Vietnam to plant there. Even more shocking is that she revealed the entirety of her illegal activity at an exports-related press event.
Taiwan’s Plant Variety and Plant Seed Act (植物品種及種苗法) states that privately carrying designated goods or items — including seeds — out of the country carries a maximum penalty of NT$2.5 million (US$76,909).
She knew she was breaking the law. Her actions have only contributed to bad impressions and stereotypes of new immigrants. As a legislator, she ought to be upholding the law, but has instead become the face of a group of bad actors.
Taiwan’s red dragon fruit, which is a huge hit in the Japanese fruit import market, is the result of the efforts of countless Taiwanese farmers.
The fruit’s cultivation process is not simple. They have to be grown and painstakingly tweaked multiple times over several growing seasons to produce desired fruit qualities before they can grow robustly in Taiwan’s climate.
All of this is the shining result of long-term Taiwanese farming techniques and expertise. The end product has been exported with massive success.
Mach’s contravention harms Taiwanese agriculture. The unlawful export of seeds hurt Taiwanese farmers, leading to the nation’s agricultural industry facing increased external competition.
Each year, exports of Taiwanese agricultural products exceed NT$5 billion. They are an important pillar of Taiwan’s economy.
As a new immigrant, Mach should use her legislative influence to legally promote the excellence of Taiwan’s products to the world and bring benefits back to Taiwan. She should not be taking seeds to other countries and harming this land that gave her the opportunity to win a position in the legislature.
Chueh Li
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS