Since the fishing boat Da Jin Man No. 88 (大進滿88) was detained last week by the China Coast Guard, the National Security Bureau (NSB) has said that 15 Taiwanese have been detained and more than 50 have been held for questioning upon entering China, Hong Kong or Macau in the past year, highlighting Beijing’s intention to not only pressure the Taiwanese government, but also intimidate ordinary civilians.
The Da Jin Man was on Tuesday last week intercepted by China Coast Guard vessels while it was operating 11.2 nautical miles (20.7km) from the Chinese coast. Although the Fisheries Agency said the boat was in a traditional “common fishing ground” between China and Taiwan, it was within Chinese territorial waters and was accused of contravening China’s summer fishing moratorium. Outlawing illegal fishing is correct, but should not be politicized.
Seventeen Taiwanese fishing boats have been boarded and seized in the past 21 years, all of which were either released at the site of the boarding following negotiations between the two coast guards, or were able to return to Taiwan after paying fines within two days after being seized, the Coast Guard Administration (CGA) said. Since 2016, the CGA has seized more than 460 Chinese vessels illegally operating in Taiwan’s waters and most of them were released as soon as they paid fines.
The Da Jin Man incident is the first time since 2007 that China has detained a Taiwanese ship for fishing out of season and held for more than a week. China implemented Coast Guard Regulation No. 3 on June 15, which allows its coast guard to board and hold vessels in disputed waters, and detain foreign nationals for up to 60 days.
The new law shows China’s ambition to unilaterally amplify its jurisdiction over surrounding waters, especially in the Taiwan Strait and disputed territory in the South and East China seas. China is increasing harassment of international sailing and fishing, oblivious to worsening tensions with neighboring countries.
A growing number of Taiwanese and foreigners traveling to China have been surveilled or detained since the implementation of Beijing’s Anti-Espionage Law. China last month also released “guidelines” threatening “separatists” with severe punishments, including the death penalty. This month, it even expanded the power of its customs officials to conduct checks of passengers’ electronic devices, in violation of international norms and human rights.
Since July last year, 15 Taiwanese have been detained to face trial after entering China and at least 51 have been interrogated by border officers, the NSB said. The Straits Exchange Foundation has also received more than 80 reports of Taiwanese personal security incidents in China from January to May.
Aside from democracy activists, who are often targeted by Chinese authorities, several retired Taiwanese military and police officers have been detained for investigation. A university professor was held and interrogated upon entry to China, despite being invited by a Chinese academy to attend formal exchange programs. Others have been arrested for bringing religious scriptures or books about vegetarianism to China.
Obviously Beijing is expanding its legal warfare to intimidate Taiwanese for their political leanings. Taiwan has cautioned nationals to avoid non-essential travel to China and to be aware of the risks to their personal safety should they decide to go.
In addition to enhancing its efforts to escort fishing vessels, the government should develop a better mechanism to rescue those who have been detained and defend its jurisdiction in the Taiwan Strait. As China’s arbitrary enforcement of its laws has become an international concern, Taiwan should seek more transnational cooperation to establish an international network for countering China’s provocative harassment and opportunistic use of its laws.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
RSS