Taiwanese fishing boats registered in Penghu and Keelung were involved in searches and detainments by China and Japan after they crossed into the countries’ territorial waters. Many people believe the incidents are about fishers’ rights or are due to cross-strait tensions. The reality is a bit different: The core of the problem stems from marine conservation.
As marine resources along coastal waters grow scarcer, fishers are traveling farther to find their catch, even crossing into other countries’ waters.
The incident involving the Penghu-registered boat and crew being searched and detained by the China Coast Guard is much more serious than the one involving Japan. Not only did the crew sail into China’s waters, they also contravened a moratorium on fishing in the area, while using prohibited equipment.
China’s seasonal fishing restrictions are effective tools against overfishing. The regulations cover the yearly spawning period for commercial marine species from May to August.
Because China strictly enforces the restrictions, they have been remarkably effective. Thanks to such policies, in place since 1995, the decline of some of China’s coastal marine resources has eased.
The increase in fish populations in China’s waters naturally boosts the diversity and number of fish in Taiwan, too. Taiwanese and Chinese fishers should comply and respect the laws of each other’s countries and not just care about their own.
That being said, where there is controversy over borders, such as at the Spratly Islands (Nansha islands, 南沙群島), as well as Taiwan’s fishing zones, the best means of resolving such conflicts should be the bilateral shelving of sovereignty issues.
Disputed maritime territories should be designated as conservation areas and jointly mapped and declared a “marine peace park.” The goal would be to together prioritize the conservation of “protected fish,” and not merely issue a joint declaration without any follow-up action.
If China and Taiwan could work toward this goal together, not only would it reduce conflict and the detainment of fishing crews and vessels, it could also help with the Marine Conservation Institute’s global “30 x 30” goal to protect and conserve at least 30 percent of waters and land across the globe.
Because marine conservation is a part of the international consensus and as the fishing boat incidents touch upon breaches of conservation, Taiwan cannot rely on international friends to bail it out. The government needs to bolster management of near-shore and coastal fishing, particularly in areas where it is easy to accidentally cross borders or zones.
The spread, guidance and training of marine conservation and sustainable fishing methods, as well as increasing fishing crews’ respect for laws and regulations should be the basis for further action.
The Ocean Conservation Administration is only responsible for the conservation of noneconomic organisms, while the Fisheries Agency is responsible for the conservation and protection of organisms of an economic nature used primarily as food.
The marine environment is one unitary system. Both classifications of organisms rely on one another. If the legislature were to hasten its review and pass a third reading of a marine conservation law, Taiwan’s surrounding marine ecosystems would be much healthier. The bill would be a big help in the replenishment of marine resources that are dwindling by the day. It would also help prevent fishers from crossing borders into perilous territories or controversial waters to chase down a catch.
Shao Kwang-tsao is an emeritus chair professor at National Taiwan Ocean University and National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Tim Smith
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS