Hsinchu City remains the richest and Hsinchu County the second-richest in Taiwan in terms of average annual household income, the Ministry of Finance’s recently released 2022 tax return data for 6.63 million households showed. Taipei ranked third, while four boroughs in Hsinchu city and county were also in the top five with the highest household incomes among the nation’s boroughs. The data suggest that the many technology professionals who reside in Hsinchu city or county and work in the nearby Hsinchu Science Park — the cradle of the nation’s high-tech ecosystem and home to Taiwan’s semiconductor industry — are becoming part of the burgeoning ranks of wealth in Taiwan in the past few years.
Residents of Hsinchu City’s Guanxin Borough (關新) reported an average annual household income of NT$4.611 million (US$143,877), up 23 percent from NT$3.747 million in 2021 and topping all other boroughs in Taiwan for the fifth consecutive year. The Guanxin borough warden told local media that of its more than 6,000 residents, about 90 percent work in the Hsinchu Science Park, mostly at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, or MediaTek Inc, the nation’s largest IC designer.
The rising household income in Hsinchu city and county reflects the effect of the reshoring of many Taiwanese tech firms leaving China amid persistent US-China trade tensions and a global supply chain realignment. It also comes as Taiwan’s semiconductor industry has gained a strong foothold over the years, leading the world in the wafer foundry, and IC packaging and testing segments, while ranking second only to the US in the IC design market.
The household income data show that the Hsinchu Science Park has for years created many of the nation’s tech upstarts, and it is fair to say many more would come from the Central Taiwan Science Park and the Southern Taiwan Science Park if firms continue investments in the parks.
The data also reveal hidden concerns for Taiwan’s economy: income inequality and imbalanced regional development. For example, the wealth gap between Hsinchu city and county and other areas in the country has been widening. In 2022, the average annual household income in Taitung County was only NT$834,000, nearly half of Hsinchu City’s NT$1.505 million and about two-thirds of Hsinchu County’s NT$1.34 million.
The data show uneven industrial development in the nation, with a few tech firms in the information technology and electronics sectors taking center stage, while non-tech manufacturers take a back seat due to price competition from Chinese companies, a weaker yen and the lukewarm recovery in the global economy. At the same time, the services sector (excluding financial firms), which accounts for more than 60 percent of the nation’s employment, contributed to economic inequality and relative deprivation due to limited wage growth for many years.
Based on regulatory filings in the past few years by publicly listed companies, employees with higher salaries tend to be employed by high-tech firms and financial institutions, while those with lower salaries tend to be employed in traditional industries. An overconcentration in any industry is always a risk, and Taiwan cannot rely solely on the high-tech industry. Not everyone can be an engineer.
The government should pay attention to the risks of overconcentration in industries, and implement policies to improve the uneven development of domestic industries and the uneven distribution of income. If a country only focuses on its tech industry, it would be like a stock market focusing solely on shares in electronics companies, which would not be good for the market’s development. Change is not easy in the short term, but not changing means fewer options in the future.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS