I would like to respond to a recent article published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) [the translation of which appears on this page as “Time to use ‘Taiwan’ name in Olympics” by Tommy Lin].
I agree with the author that from now on, the country should try to use the name “Taiwan” when participating in the Olympic Games, but I also have some different views to those stated in that article.
First, the article said that Japanese politicians offered to help the country participate in the 2020 Tokyo Olympics under the name of Taiwan. However, I am a bit puzzled by this claim.
There are many Taiwan-friendly members in the Japanese House of Representatives and House of Councillors, and there are some Taiwan-friendly groups such as the Nikka Giin Kondankai (日華議員懇談會), literally the “Japanese-Chinese parliamentary club” (Why can it not be the “Japanese-Taiwanese parliamentary club”?). They often offer assistance to Taiwan.
However, the parliament is one thing, the government is another, and the latter is who sets and implements national policies. Since Japan has official diplomatic relations with China, how can Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s administration and previous Japanese administrations openly support Taiwan’s participation in the Olympics under the name of “Taiwan”?
The article said that then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who served concurrently as the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairperson, not only did not support the name-changing campaign for the Tokyo Olympics, but also tried to “downplay and quash” it in every way, thus making it impossible for the Tokyo Olympics name changing referendum to pass. I believe that this is a big misunderstanding.
Many referendums were proposed at that time, and each had far-reaching consequences for Taiwanese. Perhaps the referendum that the author was concerned about did not seem to be widely discussed by the public, but this did not mean that Tsai did not attach importance to it.
As the most representative figure of Taiwan’s hawkish camp, how could she not support it, or sabotage it by “downplaying and quashing” the campaign? May I ask again, what is the concrete evidence of the alleged sabotage of the referendum?
In addition, the 2018 referendum, which asked people if they supported Taiwanese athletes competing in international sport competitions under the name of “Taiwan,” not passing might be due to the design set out by the National Referendum Act (公民投票法), or that people were neither particularly enthusiastic nor disapproving of the name change.
Instead of accusing Tsai of sabotage, do not forget that before the referendum a group of Taiwanese athletes stood together and shouted: “Names don’t matter, We wanna compete!” and “Politics is politics, sports is sports!” Was the Taiwanese athletes’ call not the straw that broke the camel’s back on this issue?
Hung Yu-jui is a translator and Japanese-language teacher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS