French President Emmanuel Macron’s decision to call snap elections has left him the lame duck president of a rump political movement. France now looks headed for a hung parliament — or one governed by the right-wing National Rally party. Either way, the likely result is a more fragmented polity, economic stagnation and government gridlock.
French voters hammered the political center on Sunday last week. Marine Le Pen’s National Rally won about one-third of the votes, followed by a grouping of left-wing parties promising budgetary extravagances.
Should National Rally prevail tomorrow, France would be in new political territory. Past periods of “cohabitation” have occurred between mainstream parties. Never have the presidency and the National Assembly been controlled by parties with such starkly different visions on everything from fiscal policy to international institutions, climate change and national security. A National Rally government would not only threaten to be a drag on France’s debt-laden economy, but it could also put the brakes on Europe’s attempts to boost competitiveness and prove a gift to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Macron’s own thinking remains a mystery. If he was betting that a right-wing government could either be cowed or self-destruct before the all-important presidential election in 2027, that, too, could backfire. In a country where political disputes have a habit of spilling onto the streets, France could instead find itself even more polarized. Even if National Rally cannot form a government this time, it would be a powerful force in Parliament and a contender in 2027 for the presidency, the ultimate prize in French politics.
It is true that National Rally has gone a long way toward detoxifying a brand once associated (under a previous name) with the Holocaust denial of Le Pen’s father. Le Pen elevated the charismatic 28-year-old Jordan Bardella as a frontman and candidate for prime minister. However, the party’s current mix of nationalism, protectionism and interventionism are sufficient to rattle markets and alarm businesses. Its ascent comes at a time when leftist parties are also gaining ground, raising the risk of recession or worse, given France’s large budget deficit and debt burden. National Rally candidates spouting anti-Semitic, xenophobic and conspiratorial comments are a reminder of the party’s ugly roots.
Moreover, National Rally’s draconian policy positions — along with a deep euroskepticism and a history of pro-Putin stances — would put France on a collision course with Brussels at a time when the EU is grappling with a host of urgent challenges, including slow growth, the war in Ukraine and the costs of decarbonization. With German Chancellor Olaf Scholz also a weakened force after recent European Parliament elections, the traditional Franco-German ballast can no longer be relied on to provide a sense of direction and focus.
Macron’s predicament underlines the dangers of neglecting voters’ pain. He deserves credit for the tax and labor market reforms that marked his early tenure. He was right to seek changes to France’s out-of-control pension system. However, he failed to address concerns about living costs, housing affordability and rising immigration. His use of executive powers to bypass the National Assembly reinforced the impression of a remote and high-handed leader. Ultimately, the politician who disrupted France’s mainstream parties in 2017 came to embody the hauteur of the Paris establishment he vowed to displace.
Further reform now looks unlikely. Macron would need to learn from his mistakes and use his remaining years as president to build better bridges at home and with allies such as Poland, Britain and the US. Elsewhere in Europe, France’s political fragmentation should be a wake-up call.
As a nuclear power, a permanent member of the UN Security Council and a critical NATO ally — not to mention one of the largest economies in Europe — France remains a significant force on the global stage. Its elections matter. Its interests are best served by stable politics, a growing economy and reinforced alliances in a more threatening world. That is going to get a lot harder.
The Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch