The Youth Project that the government runs every year during summer vacation is designed to protect underage students during their long weeks away from school and ensure they do not get involved in illegal activities or allow themselves to be used by criminal gangs.
Ramped-up police checks at entertainment venues have become the flagship activity of the Youth Project, but apart from that, all members of society, whatever their status, share a common responsibility of protecting teenagers.
Only with public participation can the Youth Project have the maximum crime-prevention effect.
First of all, parents cannot be left out of the equation. Young people’s earliest teachers are their parents. As long as children have not reached adulthood, their parents should fulfill their responsibilities by arranging their children’s lives, and accompanying and guiding them during the long holidays.
In terms of legal provisions, a law should be enacted to affirm the responsibility of parents if their children set foot in improper places while on vacation. These regulations should be paired with enforcement provisions that encourage parents to fulfill their responsibilities.
Second, even when teachers are on vacation, they should not forget their obligation to care for and advise their students. Teachers should keep track of how their students are doing while on vacation by regularly keeping in touch with the youngsters and their parents.
If schools can organize a wide variety of holiday activities, including not only academic learning, but also outdoor activities and training in sports and other skills, it would greatly reduce the likelihood of teenagers engaging in improper activities and wandering into unsuitable places.
Government departments should encourage schools to arrange vacation activities for their students by providing them with substantial subsidies.
Lastly, the general public must not be absent either. Many juvenile crimes result from the uncaring attitude of the public, who are often selfishly indifferent when they see juveniles on the verge of breaking the law. Of course that is not as bad as the criminal gangs who use young people as tools to commit crimes.
This kind of situation calls for more members of the public to help the police handle such cases. Anyone who encounters such situations should promptly express concern, report unlawful activities and do what they can to stop them.
Chen Chi-nung is an educator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS