The Youth Project that the government runs every year during summer vacation is designed to protect underage students during their long weeks away from school and ensure they do not get involved in illegal activities or allow themselves to be used by criminal gangs.
Ramped-up police checks at entertainment venues have become the flagship activity of the Youth Project, but apart from that, all members of society, whatever their status, share a common responsibility of protecting teenagers.
Only with public participation can the Youth Project have the maximum crime-prevention effect.
First of all, parents cannot be left out of the equation. Young people’s earliest teachers are their parents. As long as children have not reached adulthood, their parents should fulfill their responsibilities by arranging their children’s lives, and accompanying and guiding them during the long holidays.
In terms of legal provisions, a law should be enacted to affirm the responsibility of parents if their children set foot in improper places while on vacation. These regulations should be paired with enforcement provisions that encourage parents to fulfill their responsibilities.
Second, even when teachers are on vacation, they should not forget their obligation to care for and advise their students. Teachers should keep track of how their students are doing while on vacation by regularly keeping in touch with the youngsters and their parents.
If schools can organize a wide variety of holiday activities, including not only academic learning, but also outdoor activities and training in sports and other skills, it would greatly reduce the likelihood of teenagers engaging in improper activities and wandering into unsuitable places.
Government departments should encourage schools to arrange vacation activities for their students by providing them with substantial subsidies.
Lastly, the general public must not be absent either. Many juvenile crimes result from the uncaring attitude of the public, who are often selfishly indifferent when they see juveniles on the verge of breaking the law. Of course that is not as bad as the criminal gangs who use young people as tools to commit crimes.
This kind of situation calls for more members of the public to help the police handle such cases. Anyone who encounters such situations should promptly express concern, report unlawful activities and do what they can to stop them.
Chen Chi-nung is an educator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,