When a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator asked Chief of the General Staff Admiral Mei Chia-shu (梅家樹) what would be done if members of the armed forces flinched, fled or flouted commands during wartime, Mei said that facing desperate situations on a battlefield is bound to lead to such scenarios, so they are simulated in military drills, allowing the armed forces to practice how to respond.
To get the armed forces prepared for battle, psychological and legal issues must be addressed.
The Ministry of National Defense has been giving soldiers simulated training to strengthen their resilience to stress. With intensive training, they are expected to exude confidence and enhance their survival skills.
As the saying goes, “what kills you during the battle is not only the enemy, but also yourself.”
Through simulations, members of the armed forces of all ranks can be trained and psychologically prepared to respond to any battlefield situation.
In terms of the law, court martials have been suspended for 10 years since the death of former army corporal Hung Chung-chiu (洪仲丘).
Moreover, it has been 12 years since the Examination for Military Judges was last held.
The ministry has since 2012 held the Examination of Defense Legal Officers and the 39th Han Kuang military exercises were conducted in July last year.
Furthermore, reservists participated in simulated provisional court cases to give them practical experience.
However, Lieutenant General Shen Shih-wei (沈世偉), director of the ministry’s Judicial Department, said in a symposium on military tribunals at National Taiwan University in March that he doubted a military aircraft pilot who has only had experience on simulators could accomplish a wartime mission.
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that new military judges would need opportunities to accumulate experience, but the bottom line is that court martials are no longer part of the judicial system in Taiwan.
To resolve the problem, judges provided by the Judicial Yuan are likely to be trained for wartime roles. The ministry has not yet set the plan in motion and it is unrealistic to ask judges to be trained for a military role, as an avalanche of fraud cases have crippled the judicial system.
The establishment and application of a country’s military strength hinges on the government’s national security strategy and war preparedness. The power of the military is determined by balance in war preparedness, capable soldiers and a sound court martial system.
Only when there is a military court system in place that operates properly during peacetime can military strength be maintained during wartime. If members of the armed forces desert, disobey orders or do anything that infringes on military discipline, the survival of the nation is jeopardized. This cannot be tolerated or the military’s morale and cohesion would be undermined and it would not be able to stand and fight.
If that is the case, what is the point of having a military at all?
At this critical time, with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army imposing military pressure in the Taiwan Strait, military personnel who are well-versed in the culture and military affairs surely know how to make proper arrangements regarding investigating, detaining and sentencing military offenders.
Maintenance of military discipline must be emphasized to cater to the needs of individual regiments.
The restoration of the court martial system must be considered, especially the restoration of military prosecutors.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Chen Chi-huang
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS