Newspapers in April reported that five men entered a classroom at Shih Hsin University in Taipei and wrote on the whiteboard: “Let’s enter the eight major businesses” (初入八大) — referring to the likes of bars, clubs and massage parlors. They also hit on female students on campus and drove one away from the university.
The police handled the case according to provisions of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法), but the Taipei District Court ruled that the five did not affect campus order and took the whiteboard message as a recruitment advertisement.
The “eight major businesses” refer to sectors that are not necessarily involved in illegal affairs, the court said, adding that this is “not punishable.”
The “eight major businesses” usually refers to the sex industry.
Universities are places of education and should maintain a simple, peaceful learning environment. Some post “no sales” signs at their entrances and during election campaigns, they post notices banning election activities from campuses to maintain “administrative neutrality” in the hope that teachers and students will feel at ease while teaching and learning, and not be subject to interference from outsiders.
The “eight major businesses” openly entering a university campus to “recruit talent” shows their evil motives.
The law cannot only look at whether a crime has been committed, nor can it focus solely on the final result. It must also look into the motives and possible effects of people’s actions.
In the Shih Hsin University case, what is most worrying is the potential for copycats.
What if a whiteboard message was an ad submitted by a man looking for a date? Would they be allowed on campus while carrying a sign asking for a companion, a roommate, a sugar baby or a one-night stand?
The purpose of making laws and regulations is to draw a red line for behavior, reminding people of what they can and cannot do. If judges keep using the protection of human rights and freedom of speech as an excuse to tolerate the acts of lawless people who challenge the law, it would accelerate the deterioration of Taiwan’s moral values.
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises. China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come. The purpose of excluding China is primarily
War in the Middle East, global terrorism and the Ukraine war pose significant threats to the global economy. However, according to Global Guardian, a leading security solutions firm, a conflict between China and Taiwan would cause the greatest disruption since World War II. Its Taiwan Shock Index (TSI) analyzes the potential global impacts of such a war. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) rhetoric about rejuvenating the People’s Republic of China heavily emphasizes “reunification” with Taiwan. Experts differ on when this might happen. Some point to 2027, the centenary of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), as a symbolic and strategic milestone. Others
Many local news media last week reported that COVID-19 is back, citing doctors’ observations and the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) statistics. The CDC said that cases would peak this month and urged people to take preventive measures. Although COVID-19 has never been eliminated, it has become more manageable, and restrictions were dropped, enabling people to return to their normal way of life due to decreasing hospitalizations and deaths. In Taiwan, mandatory reporting of confirmed cases and home isolation ended in March last year, while the mask mandate at hospitals and healthcare facilities stopped in May. However, the CDC last week said the number