Newspapers in April reported that five men entered a classroom at Shih Hsin University in Taipei and wrote on the whiteboard: “Let’s enter the eight major businesses” (初入八大) — referring to the likes of bars, clubs and massage parlors. They also hit on female students on campus and drove one away from the university.
The police handled the case according to provisions of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法), but the Taipei District Court ruled that the five did not affect campus order and took the whiteboard message as a recruitment advertisement.
The “eight major businesses” refer to sectors that are not necessarily involved in illegal affairs, the court said, adding that this is “not punishable.”
The “eight major businesses” usually refers to the sex industry.
Universities are places of education and should maintain a simple, peaceful learning environment. Some post “no sales” signs at their entrances and during election campaigns, they post notices banning election activities from campuses to maintain “administrative neutrality” in the hope that teachers and students will feel at ease while teaching and learning, and not be subject to interference from outsiders.
The “eight major businesses” openly entering a university campus to “recruit talent” shows their evil motives.
The law cannot only look at whether a crime has been committed, nor can it focus solely on the final result. It must also look into the motives and possible effects of people’s actions.
In the Shih Hsin University case, what is most worrying is the potential for copycats.
What if a whiteboard message was an ad submitted by a man looking for a date? Would they be allowed on campus while carrying a sign asking for a companion, a roommate, a sugar baby or a one-night stand?
The purpose of making laws and regulations is to draw a red line for behavior, reminding people of what they can and cannot do. If judges keep using the protection of human rights and freedom of speech as an excuse to tolerate the acts of lawless people who challenge the law, it would accelerate the deterioration of Taiwan’s moral values.
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
RSS