It is perhaps counterintuitive that the US would orchestrate a mass naval exercise based in Hawaii, including the participation — this year — of 28 other nations, and say that the intention is to maintain regional peace.
While the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises include activities centered on humanitarian aid and disaster relief, it is hard to escape the fact that the predominant component is military in nature, including testing of weapons and promotion of interoperability of the armed forces of nations that do not usually have such opportunities.
With the arrival of the USS Carl Vinson, a Baden-Wurttemberg-class frigate of the German Navy and the JS Kunisaki, a Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Osumi-class tank landing ship, at Pearl Harbor, and plans to sink the USS Tarawa, a decommissioned amphibious assault ship — the largest vessel to be used in the regular sink exercise component of RIMPAC in more than a decade — it is clear that the US means business with this year’s event.
The list of participating units — 40 surface ships, three submarines, 150 fighter jets, 14 land-based armed forces and 25,000 personnel — over the two-month program running from Thursday last week through Aug. 1 speaks to the scale and ambition of the exercises, as does the nature of the nations taking part. RIMPAC this year includes Pacific Rim nations such as Australia, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, South Korea and the US, in addition to Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. This last group represents six of the 10 members of ASEAN.
Other participating states from beyond the Pacific Rim, but with an interest in increasing their presence and the maintenance of peace in the Indo-Pacific region, are Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Italy, the Netherlands and the UK.
However, China was not invited this year. It was asked to attend the 2014 and the 2016 exercises, but not to subsequent events due to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) reluctance to adhere to international rules or norms and standards. The US does not mention China by name as the cause for international concern that puts it front and center of the military exercises, but the name hardly needs to be said.
China’s state-backed Global Times noticed the elephant in the room and the meaning behind the planned sinking of the Tarawa, in an editorial on Thursday last week brushing off the US as a “paper tiger” and RIMPAC as a “muscle show,” and insisting that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy would not be impressed or intimidated.
It also accused the US of “poisoning ... the peaceful atmosphere in the Asia-Pacific region” through the exercises.
The accusation that any country other than China was “poisoning the peaceful atmosphere” of the region is pure projection and a repeat of similar attempts by Chinese Minister of National Defense Dong Jun (董軍) at the Shangri-La Dialogue defense forum in Singapore from May 31 to June 2. In his comments at the forum, Dong tried to persuade his audience that the US should withdraw from the region and that ASEAN should play a more central role.
What the Global Times’ editorial fails to recognize is that RIMPAC is not so much a show of force by one country, but a show of concern by all participating nations, including the ASEAN members, who would be happy for China to join in, but understand that it is the very country that makes the military nature of the exercises so necessary.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
RSS