Many of Latin America’s big problems, from crime to inequality, seem entrenched to the point of intractability, but here is one area where you can find good news: On the key issue of informality and financial inclusion, the region is making giant leaps forward.
The preference for cash in the region — typically a reflection of its shadow economy — is quickly declining thanks to growing digital payment alternatives. At the same time, the number of new financial start-ups has mushroomed, as more entrepreneurs and traditional players vie in a red-hot market.
Authorities and regulators should promote this positive trend. It is an opportunity to include the unbanked population, making financial products more available to formal and informal workers, and enabling small businesses to expand operations at less cost.
At the same time, it helps to reduce the region’s infamous bureaucracy and to spur much-needed productivity increases through technology.
The evidence of this new trend is eye-popping: According to a May report by McKinsey & Co, in just two years, the debit card has replaced cash as the preferred payment method among Spanish-speaking Latin Americans.
A study by the Inter-American Development Bank and Finnovista released last month showed that the number of fintechs in Latin America and the Caribbean grew 340 percent to more than 3,000 firms in just six years through last year.
And seven out of 10 Latin American adults have already made or received payment through digital means, according to the Beyond Borders 2024 survey.
Many factors are driving these developments, not least the confinement of the COVID-19 pandemic: Months spent at home and working remotely meant millions tried new mobile payment options and e-banking platforms to avoid going to physical branches, thereby becoming familiar with the mechanics.
Ease of use, speed and better control of expenses are cited as among the top reasons for relying on digital payments and debit cards, particularly among the younger population. There are also technology adoption reasons; Latin Americans are heavy mobile phone and social media users.
The boom of remittances — there were almost US$160 billion in transferences to the region last year — has also prompted customers to try new digital options for their finances.
The disruption is most visible in Brazil, with the central bank’s instant-payment system, Pix, reaching more than 160 million users since its launch in late 2020.
This is nothing short of revolutionary: When I was living in Rio de Janeiro, I had to print out a PDF receipt and head to the bank to pay my rent to a cashier every month. And that was between 2010 and 2016, not that long ago.
Now Sao Paulo-based Nu Holdings Ltd, a fintech that was only starting when I was living there, has already amassed more than 100 million clients across its regional operations, mostly in Brazil, but also in Mexico and Colombia, making it one of the world’s largest digital banks.
In Argentina, triple-digit inflation had the unexpected side effect of boosting the use of payments apps among suffering Argentines tired of carrying worthless bills on their wallets — while at the same time making decent returns thanks to the platforms’ investment options.
Of course, big structural shortages must be overcome, from the difficulty of changing customers’ behavior to the irresistible charm of cash when doing irregular or tax-avoiding transactions.
In the McKinsey survey, 70 percent of respondents still said they have used cash within the previous 30 days. This is an obvious area where the government has an interest in promoting digital tools that provide transparency and formality — starting with the state’s own tax and procurement platforms to working toward the so-called interoperability enabling different apps to operate with any merchant or customer without regulatory distinctions.
Pedro Rivas, the head of Mercado Pago in Mexico, also cites telecommunication infrastructure problems such as the lack of cellular network coverage in parts of the country.
“On a scale from one to 10 in the market development cycle, we are only at four,” Rivas told me. “Cash continues to be our main competitor.”
Mercado Pago, which is the fintech unit of MercadoLibre Inc, reported a 38 percent annual increase in monthly active users in Latin America during the first quarter, to 49 million customers, and more than US$5.5 billion in assets under management.
With its population of almost 130 million and a sizeable informal market, Mexico is the battleground where traditional banking players and fintechs are stirring up the competition.
Regulators would do well to follow the Pix strategy to accelerate the process, especially now that Brazil plans to take the system beyond its borders.
In any case, the era of consumers and merchants getting anything from loans to credit cards through a mobile app is here and unstoppable. Thanks to the digital revolution, a generation of Latin Americans who never had access to financial tools can finally benefit from them.
Cash is looking to be diminishing as the king of the region.
J.P. Spinetto is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Latin American business, economic affairs and politics. He was previously Bloomberg News’ managing editor for economics and government in the region. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,