The clash between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea is on everybody’s lips in Manila. Prayers broadcast on the radio plead to a higher power for provocateurs to be kept out. Tensions are high, and the Southeast Asian archipelago needs to work with Beijing and Washington to lower the temperature, but not capitulate to Chinese demands.
Doing so would set a precedent for other claimants with stakes in the waterway that would be next to impossible to row back from.
The challenge for Manila now is to balance its economic interests with China without ceding its territorial rights. An incident in the contested waterway on June 17 between Filipino sailors on a resupply mission to the BRP Sierra Madre and the China Coast Guard was among the more aggressive recently.
Illustration: Mountain People
It is not as much that Beijing has won this round — the resupply mission was aborted — but that Manila bungled the fallout with departments at odds about what actually happened.
There appears to be a greater degree of unity now and that is critical as the country attempts to manage the China threat.
The stakes are not just about the Philippines’ sovereignty. They are also about what lies under the waters: huge reserves of oil, gas and fish. Security and trade in the Indo-Pacific region is part of the US’ multi-pronged strategy of engaging with partners and allies, which is why it is pushing for freedom of navigation there.
About 60 percent of maritime trade passes through the Indo-Pacific region. Maintaining an international presence is essential, or else the territory risks being controlled wholly by China.
That was the pitch that US Ambassador to the Philippines MaryKay Carlson made at the East-West Center International Media Conference in Manila last week. She called on China to cease its “bullying behavior” and “harassment of the vessels operating lawfully in the Philippine exclusive economic zone.”
All countries should have sovereign rights to explore, utilize, conserve and manage natural resources in their economic zones, and Beijing should end its interference, Carlson said.
That is obviously not how China sees it — it lays claim to almost all of the South China Sea and earlier this month put in place new regulations that effectively allow it to treat any foreign vessels as trespassers in its waters.
It takes courage to stand up to Beijing: It is now the No. 1 trade and investment partner for many countries in the region, while foreign direct investment flows to the Philippines have fallen in the past few years, according to Arsenio Balisacan, secretary of the Philippine National Economic and Development Authority.
Manila does not want to stop working with China, officials have told me during my visit, and there are already efforts under way to arrange a diplomatic meeting between the two sides.
Any rapprochement would need to be carefully managed so as not to rile up a domestic audience upset by what it views as a very public humiliation of Filipino forces.
Another proposal is for the Philippines to push ahead with a law of its own in the South China Sea that would allow it to affirm its jurisdiction under the auspices of the UN. The process for the bill to become law is quite far advanced by all accounts and just needs to be signed by Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
In theory, it would allow the Philippines to closely monitor vessels entering its territorial seas and block those illegally entering, Jonathan Malaya, assistant director-general of the Philippine National Security Council, told me.
This would provide Manila with the legitimacy to defend itself against Beijing’s claims.
Additionally, more frequent joint naval exercises between the US and the Philippines would also help to deter China. There is one expected in the coming weeks, the Washington Post reported.
The US should help Manila by regularly patrolling the waters, and enlisting the support of Japan, South Korea and Australia, which have significant forces in the region and similar strategic aims.
If your neighborhood cop only comes out to police the surroundings every few months, one retired admiral told me, how safe will your home be?
These are all good measures. The key focus now is to ensure that Manila can assert its rights in the contested waterway without being dragged into a dangerous conflict that would almost definitely involve the US and its allies.
This round might have gone to China, but this will be a long and drawn out fight. There is still time to win the next one.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Many local news media last week reported that COVID-19 is back, citing doctors’ observations and the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) statistics. The CDC said that cases would peak this month and urged people to take preventive measures. Although COVID-19 has never been eliminated, it has become more manageable, and restrictions were dropped, enabling people to return to their normal way of life due to decreasing hospitalizations and deaths. In Taiwan, mandatory reporting of confirmed cases and home isolation ended in March last year, while the mask mandate at hospitals and healthcare facilities stopped in May. However, the CDC last week said the number