The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises.
China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come.
The purpose of excluding China is primarily to maintain regional security and stability. Beijing has disrupted peace, and the international community believes that its participation would not benefit the military exercise. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) flouts international law and is engaged in intimidating neighboring countries. Therefore, excluding China from RIMPAC is aimed at reducing political tensions. This decision provides insight into the perception of the CCP’s behavior among Pacific countries, including Taiwan.
The exclusion from RIMPAC will detract from China’s influence on the international stage. Furthermore, its exclusion suggests that its national defense and military tactics will take a hit from losing the opportunity to engage in military collaboration with other countries. Worse yet, it is highly likely to sour its political relationships with these countries. In the final analysis, China’s political clout will diminish because of this exclusion.
China’s absence from RIMPAC shows that the world has lost faith in the prospect of China’s peaceful rise. Taiwan and its democratic allies across the globe must unite to foil its ulterior motives and to maintain regional security. As one of the world’s democracies, Taiwan undoubtedly has a responsibility to participate in international affairs and assist in constraining China, and help safeguard democratic values and stand up to any threats that might shake the foundations of democracy.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Chen Chi-huang
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
RSS