US officials and tech leaders have spent much of this year celebrating the success of all-out efforts to stifle China’s artificial intelligence (AI) ambitions.
However, it is too soon to count Beijing out of the race, and US attempts to limit China’s progress have pushed the nation to advance in creating a homegrown ecosystem at a time when developing sovereign AI has emerged as a global national security imperative. It would be unwise to underestimate the stakes for China.
At a Huawei developer conference on June 21, the chairman of Huawei Technologies Co’s consumer business arm, Richard Yu (余承東), said the tech giant, long kneecapped by US restrictions, has taken 10 years to do what it took European and US counterparts 30 years. Yu touted Huawei’s latest processors as 1.1 times more effective in training AI models than other offerings on the market. (Notably, Yu stopped short of naming specifics here, while previous Bloomberg News reporting suggests costly and mixed results in the firm’s semiconductor push). But Huawei’s race to develop its own chips has also surprised industry watchers, and even caught the attention of Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), the chief executive officer of AI’s golden child, Nvidia Corp.
Separately, Chinese quant firm High-Flyer Capital Management quietly released an open-source AI model earlier last month dubbed DeepSeek Coder V2 that impressed much of the global tech community with its ability to write code and do math. Its developers also claim it beat competitors at common benchmarks — at a fraction of the cost of other tools developed by US tech giants, and despite the intense restrictions on access to chips from Washington.
US tech curbs on semiconductors present the biggest obstacles to China’s ambitions. Companies have been cut off from accessing the most-advanced chips and manufacturing tools made by the US and its allies. However, this has also incentivized Beijing to double down on longer-term efforts to create a self-sufficient chips and AI ecosystem.
Dutch firm ASML Holding NV, which effectively holds a monopoly over the most advanced machines required for developing cutting-edge chips, finds itself in the middle of the geopolitical hot mess. The Dutch government, under US pressure, has banned the sale of its top-of-the-line equipment in China. However, as chief executive officer Christophe Fouquet said in the Wall Street Journal earlier last month, the more restrictions, the stronger the push for people to do it themselves.
Access to chips is a critical aspect of the global AI race, but access to talent is arguably the backbone of development, and by this measure, China is making immense strides. Top-tier researchers originating from China jumped to 47 percent in 2022 from 29 percent in 2019, while those coming from the US fell to 18 percent from 20 percent. Many of the brightest minds in the field are still choosing to work in the US, but China is rapidly closing the gap, according to most recent data tracked by the think tank Macro Polo.
Indeed, by most measures, the US remains the global front-runner when it comes to AI, but the technology that promises to transform entire industries has not even begun to peak.
The US spent years trying to cripple Huawei’s tech dominance, and for a while, it seemed to be working. However, the company’s recent successes have since shown that these efforts might have backfired and made it stronger and more self-sufficient. The numbers do not lie: Huawei’s profit surged 564 percent in its March quarter.
China has long resented foreign attempts to influence its economy, dating back to the 19th century when the British Empire tried to force China to buy opium. More recently, this patriotism has been cited as one factor that pushed domestic sales of Huawei smartphones and led to the company’s Harmony operating system overtaking Apple Inc’s iOS in Chinese market share earlier this year.
Huawei’s surprise comeback shows it is unwise to underestimate how Chinese companies and consumers behave when they feel oppressed by a foreign power and how that is galvanizing them in the AI race. Sheer market size alone and a collective national interest could tip the balance of power toward Beijing in the years ahead. Washington should not discount how imposing scarcity all too often breeds innovation.
Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Previously she was a tech reporter at CNN and ABC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
RSS