In December 2010, while property prices were on the rise, the Ministry of Finance implemented a preferential housing loan program with favorable mortgage rates for first-time homebuyers in an effort to lessen the pressure on young people and meet real demand for self-occupied homes. Eight state-run banks have participated in the program, and anyone without a property registered under their name could apply for the loans regardless of their earning ability.
As home prices continued to soar, a lack of affordable housing remained a top complaint among young people. The ministry in August last year instructed the state-run banks to refine four major areas of the preferential loan program. The revisions offer more flexible conditions for applicants, such as increasing the maximum loan amount from NT$8 million to NT$10 million (US$245,806 to US$307,257), extending the loan period from 30 to 40 years and expanding the grace period for repayment from three years to five years. In addition, the government and the banks provide additional loan interest subsidies lasting three years until July 31, 2026.
From August last year to May, the revised program had alleviated the financial burden on many young families, assisting in the purchase of 57,980 homes by people who previously did not own a house. About 73 percent of the people who took out the loans were aged 40 or younger, ministry data showed. The revised program has helped support the local housing market, driving average prices to rise more than 10 percent year-on-year during the first four months of this year and ushering in the start of a new housing boom since the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, it has also prompted the central bank to introduce a sixth round of selective credit controls to cool the housing market as well as raise the reserve requirement ratio by 0.25 percentage points to soak up about NT$120 billion of liquidity in the market. Meanwhile, critics have raised concerns over the misuse of the program, such as borrowers using dummy bank accounts to apply for preferential housing loans or leasing their houses for investment purposes.
The renewed surge in home prices might stem from the recovering growth in the economy, the wealth effect of a bullish stock market or an imbalance between supply and demand in the housing market. It might also be caused by people’s inflationary expectations or investor speculation. The preferential loan program is not solely to blame for rising housing prices and should not be discredited as a tool of real-estate speculators; rather, it helps those in need.
Nonetheless, the negative sentiment toward the preferential loan program indicates that there is still room for improvement, from drafting new measures to conducting process simulations and executing a revised program. The government must also work harder to crack down on abuse. The Executive Yuan’s decision to conduct a comprehensive review of the program is a good start, and its announcement last week to tighten rules for borrowers shows that this administration remains committed to promoting housing justice, combating real-estate speculation and taking care of young people.
However, to facilitate the healthy development of the overall housing market, the government needs to go further and conduct a comprehensive review of the nation’s real-estate policies, accounting for key elements such as population and family structure, regional and industrial development, transportation and quality of life. A crisis can serve as a turning point, and complaints about the preferential loan program could hopefully be a good start for the government to refine its real-estate policy.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS