Chen Mu-yi (陳慕義), who won the Golden Horse Award for Best Supporting Actor last year, wrote on the messaging app Line: “There is no need for further comment. I am clear on what I have done, and most importantly, I know my situation and where I stand. After the Golden Horse Awards, I have not received any more job opportunities. This is an unforeseen and unique circumstance, so I will just smile and let it be.”
Chen’s early involvement as a founding member of the Taiwan Independence Party, coupled with his strong Taiwanese consciousness, has unfortunately impeded his career within the pro-blue camp and pro-China film industry.
National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) invited Brigitte Lin (林青霞) to be the keynote speaker for this year’s graduation ceremony. If the university wished to invite an actor to share insights on life and art, Chen was the obvious choice. As a symbol of Taiwanese identity within the film industry, he deserves the utmost respect.
Lin missed the mark entirely with her speech. It lacked substance and meaning, and was filled with about 60 egoistic “I’s.” It was as if she was trying to show off to mummy that she was on the big stage today.
By comparison, actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) delivered an enlightening and moving speech at Harvard University last year. It was on an entirely different level to Lin’s. This is how it should be done.
NTHU has only responded to external criticisms by issuing a statement calling for “tolerance of cultural pluralism.”
If the graduates cannot tell that the speech is just “empty corrupt talk,” and if lecturers lack the courage to speak up, does NTHU truly foster a culture of critical thinking and a diverse cultural environment as it claims to do?
Lin is pro-China and has repeatedly avoided the question of Taiwanese identity. In her acceptance speech for the Golden Horse Lifetime Achievement Award, Lin referenced “the place where she grew up” or “here” to talk about Taiwan, but not once did she say “Taiwan.”
She also stayed silent on the Xinjiang cotton controversy in 2021, a clear indicator of her political leanings.
She was born and raised in Taiwan, and rose to fame here, and even if she married a Hong Konger and moved there, is she not still Taiwanese? Sadly, Taiwanese identity and human rights issues seem to mean nothing to her.
China is hostile to Taiwan, and NTHU’s decision to invite an actress with a dubious sense of identity is perplexing. It makes one wonder about their true principles and allegiances.
Films and literary works of political content, addressing transitional justice and amplifying marginalized voices, have long been covertly suppressed and underfunded. A pro-blue and pro-China elite circle has consistently called the shots, monopolizing control over resources.
Lin’s recipience of the Lifetime Achievement Award despite her mediocre performances is a wake-up call. It is crucial to recognize and celebrate artists like Chen who defend Taiwanese identity.
Those who select keynote speakers need to do a better job of inviting those with a perspective to protect Taiwan.
Although it might seem like a small step, the collective determination to defend the nation and strengthen Taiwanese national consciousness begins in the academic and cultural fields. Higher education, in particular, should shoulder this responsibility.
To this end, the ministries of culture and education must continue to push for greater investment in a reshaped vision that places Taiwanese consciousness at the center.
Chu Meng-hsiang is former deputy secretary-general of the Lee Teng-hui Foundation.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
The official media of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) reacted to the May 20 inauguration speech of President William Lai (賴清德) by asserting: “Lai’s words reveal his true intention of sacrificing peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait for his own desire for power.” This baseless accusation by Beijing that Lai is manipulating Taiwanese to resist unification with China for his personal gain, is part of a broader CCP information warfare campaign that has intensified since Lai’s election. This campaign, orchestrated by the United Front Work Department, the CCP’s agency for coordinating influence operations and propaganda, aims to demoralize Taiwanese,
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
A few days after the presidential election, Nauru switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing. The “coincidence” fooled nobody. It was clearly a message to Taiwanese voters, punishing them for the audacity of electing President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party. What was surprising was the stated reason for Nauru’s decision, which referenced UN Resolution 2758, even though China’s economic clout was the more obvious impetus. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long tried to push the idea that the resolution bars Taiwan from participation in the UN and states that Taiwan is a territory of China. It does
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the