A local broadcaster is being investigated for reportedly allowing a correspondent from China’s Xinhua news agency to give it instructions about its programming, the National Communications Commission said on Tuesday.
In exchange for commercial interests in China, the broadcaster allowed Xinhua reporter Zhao Bo (趙博) to set program topics, script dialogue and supervise filming, a source told the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper), adding that other broadcasters were offered the same deal, but rejected it.
Obviously, it comes as no surprise that China is attempting to infiltrate the media in Taiwan. It is good that other broadcasters had the integrity to reject this offer, but the channel that allegedly accepted it must be made an example of. Under articles 22 and 27 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the channel could face a fine of NT$400,000 to NT$2 million (US$12,327 to US$61,633), and may be ordered to suspend broadcasting or have their license revoked.
A fine is unlikely to be a deterrent to would-be offenders if business opportunities in China or bribes from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) would exceed the maximum fine — which is very likely, so license revocation should be a must for any broadcaster found collaborating with the CCP. At the same time, anyone at the broadcaster involved in the offense should have their finances scrutinized, and be prohibited from ever owning, operating, investing in or working for any media outlet in Taiwan again.
China is well aware that it lacks the capability to invade Taiwan at present. It is also highly unlikely to impose a military blockade around Taiwan, which could lead to US military involvement.
Even a quarantine is unlikely according to experts who recently commented on the matter. Carl Schuster, former director of operations at the US Pacific Command’s Joint Intelligence Center, told CNN that a quarantine would be too costly and risky for China.
Given its limited options to force unification on Taiwan, China is likely to continue pressuring Taiwan through a combination of “gray zone” tactics, manipulation of Taiwan’s legislature and “united front” efforts such as cognitive warfare waged on social media by infiltrating schools and organizations in Taiwan. Taiwan must swiftly and resolutely respond to any sign of these efforts and must not allow Taiwanese collaborators to act with impunity.
It is odd that correspondents from Chinese state-run media would be permitted to operate in Taiwan, given that the Taiwanese government is well aware of the CCP’s cognitive warfare efforts against it.
In the same vein, several legislators from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) reportedly are known to have contact with CCP officials, and it has been alleged that some legislators act under instructions from the CCP. Given such suspicions, it makes little sense that active legislators in Taiwan should be permitted to travel to China.
The threats directed against Taiwan and its people continue to worsen under the administration of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), with the CCP most recently threatening those in favor of Taiwan’s independence with the death penalty.
It is time that Taiwan’s government begins placing restrictions on exchanges with China. Failure to do so puts Taiwanese at risk of losing their freedoms and way of life.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS