Last week the Los Angeles Unified School District took a big step in favor of common sense: It voted to ban the use of mobile phones during school days. Other districts should follow its lead, starting with the largest one in the country: New York City.
Two decades ago, our administration banned mobile phones in all public schools, despite the storm of protests it generated. The ban was one of many policy changes that allowed us to transform the school system in ways that dramatically raised student achievement levels. Although it was undone by our successor, public support for mobile phone bans has grown nationally — and across party lines.
Teachers know all too well how disruptive phones are to learning, with 72 percent of high-school teachers nationwide calling phone use a “major problem.” No wonder: One study found that 97 percent of teenagers use their phones during school hours, receiving a median of 237 push notifications a day. Much of that screen time consists of playing video games, browsing social media and watching pornography — not exactly the three R’s.
Unsurprisingly, this can have devastating effects on learning. A large body of evidence has associated increased phone use with impaired academic performance, including lower test scores, worse grades, reduced long-term retention and wider achievement gaps. Phone-related anxiety is widespread: One study found that students who are glued to their screens can create a cascade of distraction among their peers, while another found that the “mere proximity” of a mobile device is enough to impede focus.
Phones in classrooms can contribute to serious harm outside of school, too. A growing body of evidence suggests a connection between increased use of smartphones and social media and threats to young people’s brains, including a higher risk of depression, poorer cognitive control, chronic sleep deprivation and worse socio-emotional functioning. A recent advisory from the US surgeon general warned that social media is creating a “profound risk of harm to the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents.” Although the data is not conclusive, ignoring it would be crazy.
About three-quarters of US schools report that they prohibit phone use for nonacademic reasons, but without a complete ban — including on flip phones that allow texting — students easily evade the rules. Plus, many schools allow exceptions that can vary from classroom to classroom. Such policies are hard to enforce, impose outsized burdens on teachers and often leave students just as distracted, as their phones buzz and beep in their backpacks all day. Districtwide bans, enforced uniformly throughout the school day, including during lunchtime and breaks, are far more likely to be effective.
Studies suggest that mobile phone bans can do a lot of good, as we saw in New York City. Analyses of previous prohibitions in Europe have found evidence of increased grades and test scores, less bullying, and reduced achievement gaps. That would come as no surprise to high-school teachers.
There is a bill in the US Congress, the focus on learning act, that would provide funds to study the issue, solicit feedback from parents and help schools pay for phone lockers and other equipment. It deserves support, but districts and states should not wait for its passage.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signaled his support for a statewide ban, as has New York Governor Kathy Hochul. They should move quickly, and other governors should join them — but in the meantime, individual districts should take action on their own.
In New York City, where mobile phone policies vary from school to school, Mayor Eric Adams can help lead the way in adopting a comprehensive and uniform ban.
Of course, some children and parents would complain and argue. My advice to elected officials and school boards is simple: Do not buy it. There is too much at stake.
It is encouraging that more elected leaders are finally acknowledging what teachers have known for years: Mobile phones are a problem that children cannot be expected to manage. Let us do students the great service of taking that problem out of their hands.
Michael R. Bloomberg is the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News, UN Special Envoy on Climate Ambition and Solutions and chair of the Defense Innovation Board.
Deterrence is fading; war is looming on the Taiwan Strait and for other targets of the China-enabled dictatorship alliance, and after three years the cure is just dawning on the Biden Administration. Now mind you, for a May 28, 2024 interview with Time magazine, President Joe Biden made his 5th public commitment that the United States would defend Taiwan. Less than three weeks later the United States Navy, along with ships from navies of Japan, Canada, the Netherlands, and France, were conducting the Valiant Shield joint force exercise in the Philippine Sea south of Taiwan and in the South China Sea to
The official media of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) reacted to the May 20 inauguration speech of President William Lai (賴清德) by asserting: “Lai’s words reveal his true intention of sacrificing peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait for his own desire for power.” This baseless accusation by Beijing that Lai is manipulating Taiwanese to resist unification with China for his personal gain, is part of a broader CCP information warfare campaign that has intensified since Lai’s election. This campaign, orchestrated by the United Front Work Department, the CCP’s agency for coordinating influence operations and propaganda, aims to demoralize Taiwanese,
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) on Friday said the ministry supports keeping priority seats on public transportation, but is considering expanding the eligibility criteria and renaming the seats. Chiu’s remarks came after local news media over the past few weeks reported incidents involving priority seats, once again sparking heated discussion about whether the seats should be abolished or regulations regarding them should be revised. On June 11, an older woman asked a young woman on a Taipei MRT train to yield her priority seat. The young woman refused, saying that she needed the seat after working a 12-hour shift.