US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record.
It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation.
The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company.
It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to raise doubts about international relations and aviation safety.
In the midst of competition between the world’s two most powerful nations — the US and China — the latter has supplied counterfeit titanium materials to Boeing.
In so doing, China has tried to cause a US plane to crash, which would spread fear among the US public and cause Americans to distrust their own government, believing that this problem arose because US officials failed to strictly monitor the situation.
It would also have a negative impact on the reputation of Boeing aircraft.
China’s provision of counterfeit titanium materials to Boeing could also have a negative effect on Boeing’s sales performance in the US and foreign markets. A decline in Boeing’s sales would be sure to have a heavy impact on the US’ military and civil aviation industries.
That would give China an opportunity to develop its own aerospace industry and even surpass the US to become the new world leader in the aerospace sector.
Apart from the above-mentioned strategies, China is also trying to spread fear internationally so that other countries that buy Boeing products become distrustful of the US, in the belief that the US deliberately sells substandard products to make money from other countries and use the ill-gotten wealth to increase its investments.
China’s actions therefore go beyond undermining the US’ relations with its allies. China can also exploit each and every opportunity to gain more allies for itself.
China is prepared to take extreme measures to counter the US’ military might, even putting people’s lives at risk by exporting problematic titanium materials to the US. Such unscrupulous behavior in pursuit of its goals has triggered harsh criticism from around the world.
The Chinese Communist Party has never shied away from sacrificing human lives to achieve its goals, so we must be especially cautious about any products that are made in China.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Julian Clegg
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS