A few days after the presidential election, Nauru switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing. The “coincidence” fooled nobody. It was clearly a message to Taiwanese voters, punishing them for the audacity of electing President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party. What was surprising was the stated reason for Nauru’s decision, which referenced UN Resolution 2758, even though China’s economic clout was the more obvious impetus.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long tried to push the idea that the resolution bars Taiwan from participation in the UN and states that Taiwan is a territory of China. It does neither, which is clear to anyone who takes the time to read the text of the resolution. Taiwan is not even mentioned.
Even though pushing its Resolution 2758 narrative has long been a part of the CCP’s playbook for reinforcing its position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, it has ratcheted up the focus on the document after Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧) was made deputy head of the Central Leading Group for Taiwan Affairs in January last year. It is no stretch to imagine that Wang and the CCP were firmly behind Nauru’s citing of 2758, putting it front and center of the narrative on cross-strait issues, just as the CCP pushed other countries — namely Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan — to mention the “one China” principle in statements and link it to the resolution, to back up Beijing’s contention that the UN had “settled the status of Taiwan.”
There must, and has been, pushback against these misrepresentations. At a UN meeting on Sept. 20 last year, then-Marshallese president David Kabua called on the UN to rescind its interpretation of Resolution 2758. On May 16, US senators proposed a resolution to reject China’s mischaracterization of 2758. The resolution reaffirmed that Washington’s “one China” policy differs from Beijing’s “one China” principle, adding that the CCP was weaponizing 2758.
On April 30, US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Mark Lambert spoke in Washington at the German Marshall Fund about the CCP’s “mischaracterization” of Resolution 2758. On Thursday last week, two US deputy assistant secretaries of state visited Taiwan and met with Taiwanese officials and representatives from Taiwan’s 12 allies, as well as those from Australia, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, the EU, Finland, France, Japan, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Poland and the UK, to discuss 2758 and its implications for Taiwan’s participation in the UN, news reports said.
In all things, an action is met with a response. The more vehemently the CCP tries to peddle its mischaracterization of Resolution 2758, the more other nations not under its sway would feel the need to expose the falsehoods. Had China not ramped up its rhetoric, the lies would not have been so clearly exposed.
UN Resolution 2758 says nothing about Taiwan’s status, and it is not pertinent to Taiwan’s ability to join the UN. Article 1 of the UN Charter states that one of the global body’s purposes is to “develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples.” The majority of Taiwanese would tell you that they consider themselves to be a people in their own right. Nobody but Taiwanese have the right of the self-determination of the Taiwanese.
Taiwan fulfills the criteria laid out in Article 1 of the 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States for statehood, with the possible exception of international recognition, although it is still recognized by 12 countries. The obstacles to Taiwan’s participation in the UN are not legal, they are political, pushed by the CCP and based on Beijing’s lies.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS