Taiwan is a democratic country where the military parade, often a show of force by authoritarian governments, is a thing of the past.
However, there was an exception earlier this month on the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the legendary Whampoa Military Academy by the Republic of China (ROC) with Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) as the superintendent and ROC founder Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) as the ceremonial premier of the academy.
The Republic of China Military Academy, a direct successor of Whampoa, held a centennial ceremony presided over by President William Lai (賴清德), Taiwan’s commander in chief.
Something embarrassing happened when one unit representing academy alumni did not salute the president, leading to speculation ranging from that it was an “honest mistake” to a “humiliating gesture” to even “disloyalty to Taiwan.”
Given the political atmosphere of “blue” versus “green” in the Legislative Yuan, the event could hardly fail to cause political ripples. At a crucial moment when the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) recently surrounded Taiwan with military exercises externally, and legislators are trying to grab power internally, defending democracy and freedom has never been so serious.
Freedom is never free. We owe so much to the few who have fought the enemies of the country in military conflict. It is important for us to recognize and celebrate our heroes and she-roes!
It is noteworthy that Chiang named the cadet dormitories in the military academy after 10 generals who fought the CCP and sacrificed themselves, were killed or committed suicide on the battlefield. All of them died in their 30s or 40s.
“Duty, Honor, Country” has been the US Military Academy’s motto since 1898 and is meant, according to the academy, to inspire courage when courage seems to fail, to regain faith when there seems to be little cause for faith, and to create hope when hope becomes forlorn.
History shows that societies always make progress despite some setbacks in justice, welfare and humanity. Sometimes, even a democratic government might not deserve the support of the people, but an authoritarian government is, as a rule, inhumane and seriously flawed.
Democracy, while fragile, imperfect and often ineffective, has been the best political system that human beings have achieved through thousands of years, if not longer, of brutalities, tragedies and wars. The right side of history has to be democracy, not autocracy.
However, in Taiwan, there is always this question about which country you are fighting for. That confusion is fading, but still exists among some military and government personnel and citizens alike.
The question should be: Are we fighting aggression, protecting the weak and the disadvantaged, and standing up for the higher principles of preserving democracy and freedom?
Or are we seeking the glory of a big country at the expense of human dignity, liberty and gaiety? To put it simply, are we prepared to be on the right side of history?
Mark Twain said: “Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.” When the government loves our people, we love it back, and he who strives to make his country best loves it best.
The answer is then clear: Only a government of the people, by the people, for the people, deserves our patriotism.
We salute the patriots in the past, present and future at the academy and in the military from the bottom of our hearts.
James J.Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS