Two weeks ago, the National Health Research Institutes discovered that children with severe enterovirus infections had also been found to have hyperglycemia or high blood sugar.
As such, they inferred that people with enterovirus should avoid eating sugary foods.
Although the research on the prevention of severe symptoms is commendable, the underlying cause has not been fully identified.
Researchers hastily announced that families should not allow their kids to consume sugar while fighting off an enterovirus infection, and that they could be unexpectedly harmed.
For the most part, enterovirus infections present with mild symptoms, and those who are hospitalized can easily be dehydrated due to fever, vomiting, a refusal to eat due to mouth ulcers, electrolyte imbalance or low blood sugar.
The current standard of treatment is for an infected person to stay at home and replenish their electrolytes and fluids.
For example, the WHO recommends drinking electrolytes with a sugar content of 90 millimoles per liter.
The Centers for Disease Control suggests eating pudding or, if at an emergency clinic, to receive an intravenous drip. Both of these recommendations incorporate the ingestion of sugar.
The research team was unclear about its definition of “sweets” or “sweetened foods” when they made their announcement, creating some confusion that has led to inappropriate care by some families of people with mild symptoms, resulting in hypoglycemic shock or severe dehydration.
The reasoning is murky for “non-diabetic hyperglycemia” causing severe enterovirus symptoms.
Studies are leaning toward people with severe symptoms sometimes having excessive secretions of stress hormones such as cortisone, adrenaline and glucagon, which can cause temporary hyperglycemia.
Between hyperglycemia and severe symptoms, how do we determine which is the cause and which is the effect? Conclusions are being drawn at an unclear stage.
Promoting the idea that eating sweet foods leads to severe symptoms is unfortunately resulting in parents feeling uneasy, doctors administering clinical treatments without a factual basis and the inadvertent harming of kids.
Lin Sung-lien is a pediatrician at the Children’s Clinical Center in Keelung.
Translated by Tim Smith
Deterrence is fading; war is looming on the Taiwan Strait and for other targets of the China-enabled dictatorship alliance, and after three years the cure is just dawning on the Biden Administration. Now mind you, for a May 28, 2024 interview with Time magazine, President Joe Biden made his 5th public commitment that the United States would defend Taiwan. Less than three weeks later the United States Navy, along with ships from navies of Japan, Canada, the Netherlands, and France, were conducting the Valiant Shield joint force exercise in the Philippine Sea south of Taiwan and in the South China Sea to
The official media of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) reacted to the May 20 inauguration speech of President William Lai (賴清德) by asserting: “Lai’s words reveal his true intention of sacrificing peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait for his own desire for power.” This baseless accusation by Beijing that Lai is manipulating Taiwanese to resist unification with China for his personal gain, is part of a broader CCP information warfare campaign that has intensified since Lai’s election. This campaign, orchestrated by the United Front Work Department, the CCP’s agency for coordinating influence operations and propaganda, aims to demoralize Taiwanese,
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) on Friday said the ministry supports keeping priority seats on public transportation, but is considering expanding the eligibility criteria and renaming the seats. Chiu’s remarks came after local news media over the past few weeks reported incidents involving priority seats, once again sparking heated discussion about whether the seats should be abolished or regulations regarding them should be revised. On June 11, an older woman asked a young woman on a Taipei MRT train to yield her priority seat. The young woman refused, saying that she needed the seat after working a 12-hour shift.