Two weeks ago, the National Health Research Institutes discovered that children with severe enterovirus infections had also been found to have hyperglycemia or high blood sugar.
As such, they inferred that people with enterovirus should avoid eating sugary foods.
Although the research on the prevention of severe symptoms is commendable, the underlying cause has not been fully identified.
Researchers hastily announced that families should not allow their kids to consume sugar while fighting off an enterovirus infection, and that they could be unexpectedly harmed.
For the most part, enterovirus infections present with mild symptoms, and those who are hospitalized can easily be dehydrated due to fever, vomiting, a refusal to eat due to mouth ulcers, electrolyte imbalance or low blood sugar.
The current standard of treatment is for an infected person to stay at home and replenish their electrolytes and fluids.
For example, the WHO recommends drinking electrolytes with a sugar content of 90 millimoles per liter.
The Centers for Disease Control suggests eating pudding or, if at an emergency clinic, to receive an intravenous drip. Both of these recommendations incorporate the ingestion of sugar.
The research team was unclear about its definition of “sweets” or “sweetened foods” when they made their announcement, creating some confusion that has led to inappropriate care by some families of people with mild symptoms, resulting in hypoglycemic shock or severe dehydration.
The reasoning is murky for “non-diabetic hyperglycemia” causing severe enterovirus symptoms.
Studies are leaning toward people with severe symptoms sometimes having excessive secretions of stress hormones such as cortisone, adrenaline and glucagon, which can cause temporary hyperglycemia.
Between hyperglycemia and severe symptoms, how do we determine which is the cause and which is the effect? Conclusions are being drawn at an unclear stage.
Promoting the idea that eating sweet foods leads to severe symptoms is unfortunately resulting in parents feeling uneasy, doctors administering clinical treatments without a factual basis and the inadvertent harming of kids.
Lin Sung-lien is a pediatrician at the Children’s Clinical Center in Keelung.
Translated by Tim Smith
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
RSS