At a military base in the rural south of the Netherlands, Dutch Air Force commander General Arnoud Stallman said he expected that at some point this summer, F-16 fighter jets would finally take to the skies over Ukraine.
“Around this summertime, it is all lining up,” he said, speaking in front of two disused F-16s inside a hangar at the base, where a recent program to train Ukrainian Air Force instructors in maintenance for the jets had just come to a close.
Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands and Norway have pledged to provide Ukraine with about 80 US-made F-16 fighter jets between them, hardware that the Ukrainian Air Force has been asking for for more than a year. However, the program to get the planes in the air has been hit by delays in delivery and training.
The general said the training regimen for pilots and ground staff to operate the aircraft was not simple. “It’s not just the pilots who need training; technicians and maintainers also require thorough instruction. We’re providing comprehensive support training to ensure they can effectively maintain the aircraft. So everything has to come together,” he said.
Dutch Minister of Defense Kajsa Ollongren also said that the first deliveries of aircraft to Ukraine should take place this summer, and pushed back against criticism over the delays amid reports that Kyiv has been frustrated with the pace of pilot training.
“I completely understand the Ukrainian position, they want to do this as fast as possible … We are doing the project as fast as we can, we are really stretching our capacity,” Ollongren said.
“The F-16s are really much more complicated than the systems the Ukrainian Air Force were using so far … You cannot just hop over several steps, you have to take every step of the process, but also we want to deliver them as quickly as possible,” she added.
Ukraine has been waiting for months to start using the fighter jets, and hopes their introduction would change the dynamics of the war, forcing Russia to adopt more conservative tactics in its attacks on areas closer to the border.
Anatolii Khrapchynskyi, an aviation expert and former Ukrainian military pilot, said: “The Russians will be forced to change their tactics. We will be able to target their planes and missiles more effectively, and it will be really difficult for them to keep using KAB guided air bombs, which they need to launch from 50km to 70km away.”
Russia has been using KABs extensively against the city of Kharkiv in recent weeks, launching the bombs from planes that remain inside Russian airspace. Numerous Ukrainian sources said F-16s would protect Ukraine’s second city from these weapons.
Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, said last month: “Against these, even air defence systems are not so useful, only aviation. The F-16 has a longer range than Russian MiG and Su planes.”
Ollongren said Ukraine would be able to use the Dutch-donated fighter jets to carry out attacks inside Russia, providing that the use is for defensive purposes and complies with international law. Denmark has also said Ukraine would be permitted to use its F-16 fighter jets to attack targets inside Russia.
“We have seen that it is necessary for Ukraine to be able to strike inside Russia. Otherwise, Russia will always have an advantage. Allowing Ukraine to use weapons across the border enhances the efficiency of their military actions,” Ollongren said.
While Ukraine is eager to get the planes in the sky, Justin Bronk, an air power research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London, said the right time to deploy F-16s was a “risk-timeframe judgment call,” adding “I hope it will be made when they are tactically and operationally ready, pilots and ground crew, and not on the basis that ‘things are looking bad, we need a political win.’”
Bronk said tactics for flying F-16s would be completely new for pilots used to flying Soviet-designed MiG-29s or Su-27s. Those planes tend to fly with a high degree of intervention from the ground, with commanders authorizing weapons releases from the base, thousands of feet below the pilot. F-16 pilots, by contrast, have a lot more autonomy in the cockpit and the planes and weapons are designed to reflect this, he said.
The F-16 represents a significant advancement over Ukraine’s current fleet, including the MiG-29, Su-24 and Su-25, which have been heavily strained and damaged by the conflict. Compared with the MiG-29, Su-27 and Su-25, the F-16 can carry a larger payload of weapons, matching the capacity of Ukraine’s tactical bomber, the Su-24. Additionally, the F-16 is equipped with a more powerful radar system, which can help mitigate the radar disadvantage that Kyiv has experienced during the war.
F-16s tend to be more pilot-friendly, Stallmann said, with intuitive controls and displays that allow flyers to keep their heads up.
Stallmann said that each F-16 needed about 10 people to operate the aircraft, including the two pilots.
He said there are two training tracks, one to retrain experienced pilots to use F-16s, which is mainly taking place in Denmark and the US, and the second to train new pilots from scratch in Romania. “We have people who said: ‘I want to be a pilot.’ We test them and train them from zero,” he said.
In addition to the pilots, the F-16s require a complicated maintenance regimen. The instructors trained in the Netherlands are now expected to pass on their knowledge to others back in Ukraine.
“The issue is not so much with training the pilots as with the ground staff; there’s a whole range of people that need totally different training before these can be operated,” one Ukrainian military source said.
Some experts warned that using the F-16s would come with challenges, adding that NATO militaries would not deploy the planes without a wide range of other aircraft such as newer F-35s.
However, Stallmann welcomed a decision by Sweden to provide two Saab surveillance aircraft to Ukraine, saying they would provide crucial “in-the-air oversight” that would enhance the capabilities of the F-16s. He refused to comment on which missiles the F-16s would be equipped with, stating only that the jets would be given a “wide range of weapons.”
Russia would seek to destroy F-16s deployed in airfields on the ground, requiring them to be carefully concealed in the first instance and defended by anti-missile systems to avoid serious losses almost immediately after they arrive in the country.
Ukrainian Air Force aviation commander Serhii Holubtsov said recently that a number of F-16s would be stationed at airbases abroad. Stallman said that some maintenance of the jets would be done in Ukraine, adding that there was “no set plan in place” yet for F-16s to be repaired in the West.
Despite all the hurdles, Ukrainian aviation experts hope that the F-16s will be a game changer. “With F-16s, we can achieve parity in the sky above Ukraine and bring serious losses to Russian aviation in the border zone,” Khrapchynskyi said.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS