Silicon Valley’s “move fast and break things” mantra propelled tech innovation for the Internet age. In the era of artificial intelligence (AI), it should take a leaf out of Japan’s playbook and slow down.
A rush to deploy AI tools to the public has resulted in embarrassing blunders, from an AI-powered Google search feature recently recommending glue on pizza, to consequences that can impact real people’s livelihoods, like the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT showing signs of racial bias when ranking job applicants, as a Bloomberg analysis found.
It has also led to tech companies consuming enormous amounts of energy to power AI. The International Energy Agency estimates that the total electricity consumption for data centers across the globe would be about the same as the power demand of Japan in 2026. Other forecasters say that by 2030, these centers are on course to use more energy than India, the world’s most populous country. Large language models, the technology underpinning the latest crop of generative AI tools, require gargantuan troves of data and training them takes immense amounts of computing power and energy.
Illustration: Yusha
As the tech continues to develop, many AI firms think the key to growth is to make these large language models even larger. Some US tech titans including Microsoft Corp cofounder Bill Gates and OpenAI chief executive officer Sam Altman are even backing nuclear energy firms to help power AI data centers. However, there are other options beyond rushing to fire up new nuclear reactors to train AI models.
Tokyo-based startup Sakana AI — which Nikkei Asia reported on June 15 would become the fastest-ever Japanese company to achieve unicorn status — has taken a different approach. When it comes to the most consequential technology of our time, they are playing the long game.
“Sakana,” which means “fish” in Japanese, was created last year by David Ha, Ren Ito and Llion Jones with the goal of applying nature-inspired ideas such as evolution and collective intelligence to create AI models, and not gobbling up as much energy as possible to train a single AI model. Jones, notably, coauthored the seminal 2017 research paper while at Google that underpins the technology of today’s most popular AI products, including ChatGPT, and spurred much of the current boom.
Ha told me that much of the issues facing AI stem from companies prematurely deploying the technology in search of short-term profits, while disregarding the high energy toll. While Sakana’s technology could be used to create a virtual girlfriend chatbot now, they are more focused on researching ways to apply AI to solve real-world issues. This is in line with other Japan-based AI companies the West might have never heard of, such as Preferred Networks, which is trying to develop more energy-efficient AI chips.
Silicon Valley needs to start playing the more long game, too. The world does not need more useless chatbots that generate bad poetry — or perpetuate racist biases at scale — while consuming unsustainable swaths of resources. This way of thinking could have also spared some of the embarrassing headlines that have turned much of the public against embracing AI for good.
Sakana’s most recent research is looking at new ways of producing AI models that do not require extensive amounts of energy, and it has longer-term ambitions of helping Japan at a national scale come up with real solutions to some of its most pressing issues, including a looming labor crunch. Their mission has received support from the Japanese government.
In Japan, depopulation and a shrinking workforce have led to a public and private sector ecosystem that seeks to embrace the emerging technology’s possibilities with curiosity and hope instead of despair. There is a sense of urgency around the idea that these tools can help solve labor shortages — with less of the existential fears that they would end up replacing human workers. Microsoft Japan president Miki Tsusaka touted generative AI’s power to accelerate growth in a nation with an aging population in an interview with Bloomberg TV last week. Her comments come on the heels of Microsoft announcing it would spend about US$2.9 billion, its biggest-ever investment in Japan, to increase cloud computing and AI infrastructure.
Being a close US ally has also helped Japan in the current boom — it has welcomed a spate of US tech investment that might have previously been funneled toward China.
Along with Microsoft, OpenAI opened its first Asia office in Tokyo this spring, while Oracle Corp pledged to put more than US$8 billion over the next 10 years into cloud computing and AI.
Risk-averse Japan lost its place as a global tech leader during the past few decades, but the AI boom, still in its infancy, is an entirely different beast. This time around, its cautious and collective approach to the technology means Tokyo is uniquely positioned to come out ahead when it comes to getting AI right. The rest of the world might soon find itself playing catch-up.
Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Previously she was a tech reporter at CNN and ABC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Deterrence is fading; war is looming on the Taiwan Strait and for other targets of the China-enabled dictatorship alliance, and after three years the cure is just dawning on the Biden Administration. Now mind you, for a May 28, 2024 interview with Time magazine, President Joe Biden made his 5th public commitment that the United States would defend Taiwan. Less than three weeks later the United States Navy, along with ships from navies of Japan, Canada, the Netherlands, and France, were conducting the Valiant Shield joint force exercise in the Philippine Sea south of Taiwan and in the South China Sea to
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has once again resorted to its age-old tactic of blaming the US for China’s woes. The Financial Times on Sunday reported that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) told European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that China would not invade Taiwan because it was a trap set by the US. This is not just an attempt to deflect blame, but also a textbook example of the CCP’s “divide and conquer” strategy to sow discord between Europe and the US. However, the blame game reveals deeper problems. Xi’s power rests on the support of the Chinese People’s Liberation
The official media of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) reacted to the May 20 inauguration speech of President William Lai (賴清德) by asserting: “Lai’s words reveal his true intention of sacrificing peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait for his own desire for power.” This baseless accusation by Beijing that Lai is manipulating Taiwanese to resist unification with China for his personal gain, is part of a broader CCP information warfare campaign that has intensified since Lai’s election. This campaign, orchestrated by the United Front Work Department, the CCP’s agency for coordinating influence operations and propaganda, aims to demoralize Taiwanese,
During a meeting in April, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) told European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that the US was trying to provoke China to invade Taiwan, the Financial Times reported on Sunday last week. War with the US would destroy many of China’s achievements and undermine his goal of achieving China’s “great rejuvenation,” Xi was quoted as saying. If Xi genuinely believes the US is goading China, it shows that “concerns that Xi has created an information vacuum” or is getting bad council are “worryingly, true,” Center for Strategic and International Studies Freeman chair in China Studies Jude Blanchette