Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) on Friday said the ministry supports keeping priority seats on public transportation, but is considering expanding the eligibility criteria and renaming the seats.
Chiu’s remarks came after local news media over the past few weeks reported incidents involving priority seats, once again sparking heated discussion about whether the seats should be abolished or regulations regarding them should be revised.
On June 11, an older woman asked a young woman on a Taipei MRT train to yield her priority seat. The young woman refused, saying that she needed the seat after working a 12-hour shift. After an elderly man intervened and an argument erupted, the young woman allegedly assaulted the man. Other passengers reported the incident to MRT security.
After they were taken off the train, the elderly man told the woman he would sue unless she apologized. The woman apologized, but then apparently suddenly started banging her head on a pillar repeatedly. She was rushed to a hospital for bleeding.
MRT security told the man that priority seats are for “people in need,” which does not only mean elderly people.
On Tuesday last week, a young man on an MRT train who said that he had diarrhea was yelled at and allegedly assaulted by an elderly man for refusing to yield his priority seat.
The Taipei MRT said that 22 of the 427 dispute cases it received from January to May concerned priority seats, accounting for 5 percent.
Every now and then, the priority seats issue comes under the spotlight following an incident going viral. The government has repeatedly cited the People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act (身心障礙者權益保障法) to say that it could not abolish priority seats. The act stipulates that priority seats for people with disabilities, elderly people, pregnant women and children should be designated in public transportation.
The ministry last year proposed amending the act to add “anyone with genuine need” to the eligibility criteria, but it could not pass the legislation before the end of the legislative term. With new lawmakers in office, the amendment should be proposed again.
The ministry is also considering changing the Chinese name to “priority seats” (優先席), from the current name, which literally means “courtesy seats” (博愛座).
While the proposal to change the name and eligibility criteria was inspired by methods in some other countries, it is not clear how effective they would be in reducing disputes.
In Japan, aside from the same four designated categories as in Taiwan, signs near priority seats also mention people with internal disabilities. A survey in Japan showed that passengers’ willingness to yield their seat to others might vary based on what the seats are called.
In the UK, Transport for London offers free “please offer me a seat” badges, holds a Priority Seating Week to raise public awareness, and places signs around the seats with messages such as “please offer this seat,” “not all disabilities are visible” and “someone may need this seat more.”
In France, Paris has an order of priority, listing nine categories of people starting with military veterans and ending with elderly people aged 75 or older.
These countries are not exempt from disputes over priority seats. Before rushing to adopt other countries’ methods, Taiwan should conduct analyses, surveys and interviews to better understand passengers’ needs and concerns.
Deterrence is fading; war is looming on the Taiwan Strait and for other targets of the China-enabled dictatorship alliance, and after three years the cure is just dawning on the Biden Administration. Now mind you, for a May 28, 2024 interview with Time magazine, President Joe Biden made his 5th public commitment that the United States would defend Taiwan. Less than three weeks later the United States Navy, along with ships from navies of Japan, Canada, the Netherlands, and France, were conducting the Valiant Shield joint force exercise in the Philippine Sea south of Taiwan and in the South China Sea to
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has once again resorted to its age-old tactic of blaming the US for China’s woes. The Financial Times on Sunday reported that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) told European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that China would not invade Taiwan because it was a trap set by the US. This is not just an attempt to deflect blame, but also a textbook example of the CCP’s “divide and conquer” strategy to sow discord between Europe and the US. However, the blame game reveals deeper problems. Xi’s power rests on the support of the Chinese People’s Liberation
The official media of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) reacted to the May 20 inauguration speech of President William Lai (賴清德) by asserting: “Lai’s words reveal his true intention of sacrificing peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait for his own desire for power.” This baseless accusation by Beijing that Lai is manipulating Taiwanese to resist unification with China for his personal gain, is part of a broader CCP information warfare campaign that has intensified since Lai’s election. This campaign, orchestrated by the United Front Work Department, the CCP’s agency for coordinating influence operations and propaganda, aims to demoralize Taiwanese,
During a meeting in April, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) told European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that the US was trying to provoke China to invade Taiwan, the Financial Times reported on Sunday last week. War with the US would destroy many of China’s achievements and undermine his goal of achieving China’s “great rejuvenation,” Xi was quoted as saying. If Xi genuinely believes the US is goading China, it shows that “concerns that Xi has created an information vacuum” or is getting bad council are “worryingly, true,” Center for Strategic and International Studies Freeman chair in China Studies Jude Blanchette