Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) on Friday said the ministry supports keeping priority seats on public transportation, but is considering expanding the eligibility criteria and renaming the seats.
Chiu’s remarks came after local news media over the past few weeks reported incidents involving priority seats, once again sparking heated discussion about whether the seats should be abolished or regulations regarding them should be revised.
On June 11, an older woman asked a young woman on a Taipei MRT train to yield her priority seat. The young woman refused, saying that she needed the seat after working a 12-hour shift. After an elderly man intervened and an argument erupted, the young woman allegedly assaulted the man. Other passengers reported the incident to MRT security.
After they were taken off the train, the elderly man told the woman he would sue unless she apologized. The woman apologized, but then apparently suddenly started banging her head on a pillar repeatedly. She was rushed to a hospital for bleeding.
MRT security told the man that priority seats are for “people in need,” which does not only mean elderly people.
On Tuesday last week, a young man on an MRT train who said that he had diarrhea was yelled at and allegedly assaulted by an elderly man for refusing to yield his priority seat.
The Taipei MRT said that 22 of the 427 dispute cases it received from January to May concerned priority seats, accounting for 5 percent.
Every now and then, the priority seats issue comes under the spotlight following an incident going viral. The government has repeatedly cited the People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act (身心障礙者權益保障法) to say that it could not abolish priority seats. The act stipulates that priority seats for people with disabilities, elderly people, pregnant women and children should be designated in public transportation.
The ministry last year proposed amending the act to add “anyone with genuine need” to the eligibility criteria, but it could not pass the legislation before the end of the legislative term. With new lawmakers in office, the amendment should be proposed again.
The ministry is also considering changing the Chinese name to “priority seats” (優先席), from the current name, which literally means “courtesy seats” (博愛座).
While the proposal to change the name and eligibility criteria was inspired by methods in some other countries, it is not clear how effective they would be in reducing disputes.
In Japan, aside from the same four designated categories as in Taiwan, signs near priority seats also mention people with internal disabilities. A survey in Japan showed that passengers’ willingness to yield their seat to others might vary based on what the seats are called.
In the UK, Transport for London offers free “please offer me a seat” badges, holds a Priority Seating Week to raise public awareness, and places signs around the seats with messages such as “please offer this seat,” “not all disabilities are visible” and “someone may need this seat more.”
In France, Paris has an order of priority, listing nine categories of people starting with military veterans and ending with elderly people aged 75 or older.
These countries are not exempt from disputes over priority seats. Before rushing to adopt other countries’ methods, Taiwan should conduct analyses, surveys and interviews to better understand passengers’ needs and concerns.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
RSS