On Friday, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators denied a Cabinet request to reconsider a set of controversial bills. The amendments are set to go into effect, expanding the legislature’s power of oversight.
TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is largely to blame for this.
In the past few days, the former Taipei mayor has been particularly anxious, following a recent poll revealing that support for the TPP has plummeted.
From an initial average of 22 to 25 percent six months before the January elections, support for the TPP has dwindled to 14.3 percent — a significant drop that has cost Ko more than 1.6 million supporters. It is evident that his chances of becoming president in 2028 are slim at best.
Ko knows full well that the party’s slide in popularity is the consequence of TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) leading the party by the nose.
The collaboration between the TPP and the KMT in the past few months has led to nothing but chaos, resulting in unconstitutional actions and the introduction of bills infringing on people’s rights.
In response, people across Taiwan, including young people and centrist voters, have joined together in protest, forming the “Bluebird movement.” They are calling for the controversial bills to be sent back for review and for KMT legislators to be removed from office.
Lawyers and legal experts have also been at the forefront of the movement. When the amendments were initially passed on May 28, more than 100 Taiwanese legal experts, alongside overseas academics and the director of the American Institute in Taiwan, signed a counterpetition calling for the bills to be sent back for review.
They say that the bills jeopardize the proper functioning of the government and compromise fundamental rights.
Ko usually has a strong sense of what is going on and an astute understanding of the political climate. Yet, by failing to push TPP legislators to vote for reconsideration, he has missed an opportunity to regain lost support.
The terms of the new parliamentary amendments are too ambiguous and ill-conceived. The bills would give legislators the authority to subpoena people at any time to be questioned. Individuals would be required to provide personal information or even business secrets, lest they wish to be fined and sent to the Judicial Yuan for further investigation and prosecution.
Ko and Huang must understand: If Huang has only managed to rack up a poor 13 percent support in a recent New Taipei City 2026 mayoral election poll, it is because of the shady nature of these bills.
In this uneasy climate, how can Huang ever expect his support to pick up? Even the KMT can no longer consider him as candidate for New Taipei City mayor.
As a man of law, Huang must cease to deny the criticism of the legal community and face the ugly truth that people no longer trust his judgement. He has made his bed and must now lie in it.
For his own part and for the sake of his political career, Ko should consider revoking Huang’s party membership. If he were to lead the seven TPP legislators to correct their course, Ko might still have a chance for a political comeback. However, after Friday morning’s debacle, hope is bleak.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat, formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS