On Friday, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators denied a Cabinet request to reconsider a set of controversial bills. The amendments are set to go into effect, expanding the legislature’s power of oversight.
TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is largely to blame for this.
In the past few days, the former Taipei mayor has been particularly anxious, following a recent poll revealing that support for the TPP has plummeted.
From an initial average of 22 to 25 percent six months before the January elections, support for the TPP has dwindled to 14.3 percent — a significant drop that has cost Ko more than 1.6 million supporters. It is evident that his chances of becoming president in 2028 are slim at best.
Ko knows full well that the party’s slide in popularity is the consequence of TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) leading the party by the nose.
The collaboration between the TPP and the KMT in the past few months has led to nothing but chaos, resulting in unconstitutional actions and the introduction of bills infringing on people’s rights.
In response, people across Taiwan, including young people and centrist voters, have joined together in protest, forming the “Bluebird movement.” They are calling for the controversial bills to be sent back for review and for KMT legislators to be removed from office.
Lawyers and legal experts have also been at the forefront of the movement. When the amendments were initially passed on May 28, more than 100 Taiwanese legal experts, alongside overseas academics and the director of the American Institute in Taiwan, signed a counterpetition calling for the bills to be sent back for review.
They say that the bills jeopardize the proper functioning of the government and compromise fundamental rights.
Ko usually has a strong sense of what is going on and an astute understanding of the political climate. Yet, by failing to push TPP legislators to vote for reconsideration, he has missed an opportunity to regain lost support.
The terms of the new parliamentary amendments are too ambiguous and ill-conceived. The bills would give legislators the authority to subpoena people at any time to be questioned. Individuals would be required to provide personal information or even business secrets, lest they wish to be fined and sent to the Judicial Yuan for further investigation and prosecution.
Ko and Huang must understand: If Huang has only managed to rack up a poor 13 percent support in a recent New Taipei City 2026 mayoral election poll, it is because of the shady nature of these bills.
In this uneasy climate, how can Huang ever expect his support to pick up? Even the KMT can no longer consider him as candidate for New Taipei City mayor.
As a man of law, Huang must cease to deny the criticism of the legal community and face the ugly truth that people no longer trust his judgement. He has made his bed and must now lie in it.
For his own part and for the sake of his political career, Ko should consider revoking Huang’s party membership. If he were to lead the seven TPP legislators to correct their course, Ko might still have a chance for a political comeback. However, after Friday morning’s debacle, hope is bleak.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat, formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS