Beijing has been influencing voters who frequent Matsu temples, particularly those with no clear political leanings, as well as low to middle-income earners, researchers said at a forum on Tuesday.
Matsu temples have political influence over more than 925 people each on average, and boroughs with temples have been more prone to vote for pro-China parties, Shih Hsin University associate professor Liu Yu-hsi (劉裕皙) said, adding that the trend has been most evident in central and southern Taiwan.
Borough wardens believed to have been influenced by China had allegedly mobilized people to support the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) policies, said National Sun Yat-sen University associate professor Sher Chien-yuan (佘健源), who also spoke at the forum.
This comes as no surprise given wardens from Tainan were the subject of an investigation in December last year after reports that they had been organizing junket trips to China.
Politics and religion should be kept separate, but it is not so simple in Taiwan. Many local belief systems have their roots in China, and while Christian churches tend to align themselves with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), even DPP candidates visit Buddhist and Matsu temples while campaigning.
Nearly 28 percent of Taiwanese follow folk religions, 20 percent practice Buddhism and 19 percent follow Taoism, al-Jazeera English said on Jan. 4, citing statistics from the American Institute in Taiwan.
“More than just religious organizations, temples have long been the cornerstones of their local community, especially in rural areas,” the article said. “Taiwan’s faithful is such an important class of voters that Foxconn founder Terry Gou [郭台銘] invoked deities numerous times while floating the idea of running for president.”
Temple leaders are often politically connected, it said. China knows this. Through temples — especially Matsu temples, which have large followings in Taiwan and China — it seeks to influence religious leaders and worshipers with rhetoric about Taiwanese and Chinese being “one family.”
However, what kind of family is it when China regularly threatens Taiwan with military action, coerces international organizations into barring Taiwan’s participation and frequently imposes arbitrary, unilateral trade restrictions on the nation?
The Chinese Communist Party has little regard for Taiwanese. This is evident in comments by Chinese Ambassador to France Lu Shaye (盧沙野), who in 2022 said Taiwanese would be “re-educated” if China were to annex the nation, while comments on Chinese social media frequently say that China would “leave the island and not the people” (留島不留人).
Moreover, China has a disdain for organized religions, most of which are outlawed, while the remainder face severe scrutiny and harassment. It is shortsighted of religious leaders in Taiwan to align themselves with China or any pro-China party — something that the DPP ought to remind them of.
In the US, the Internal Revenue Code stipulates that “organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.”
Taiwan should impose similar rules, and temple leaders — as well as borough wardens — who have received remuneration from the CCP or its affiliates should face criminal charges, while their organizations should lose their income tax exemptions.
Taiwanese who go to temples should question the sincerity of spiritual leaders who not only pursue financial gain, but do so at the expense of democracy and the public good.
The DPP must set a clear precedent and while the KMT might object, it would be hard-pressed to justify why religious organizations should be allowed to receive funding and instructions from any foreign power, let alone China.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself