Unlike other natural disasters, extreme heat does not topple buildings, flood streets or turn road signs into missiles. It does not provide a dramatic backdrop for daredevil weather reporters. What it mostly does is kill people, quietly and efficiently.
It is long past time that we respect its destructive power, which will only grow as a warming planet makes heat waves more frequent and intense.
This discussion is particularly relevant this week, as a “heat blob” that has punished Mexico and the southwestern US for months creeps into the US midwest, northeast and Canada, subjecting possibly 150 million people to unseasonably high temperatures for a miserable stretch of days.
For many Americans, a heat wave is just a nuisance. They will sweat through their work clothes and blow out their power bills running the air-conditioning. Roads and sidewalks will buckle. Amtrak and public transportation around New York City will lose their spotless reputations for reliable performance (yes, that was sarcasm) as railroad tracks warp and power lines sag.
However, for hundreds of thousands of people around the world every year, heat is deadly. In the US, it takes more lives than hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes or floods.
It contributed to the deaths of more than 2,300 Americans last year, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the most in 45 years of record-keeping.
The number of such heat-related deaths has more than doubled in just the past five years.
Although this week’s heat wave will have all the hallmarks of a discrete natural disaster like a named hurricane or serious earthquake, including the threat to human life and health, the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will not treat it as such. That is because it does not consider heat waves or wildfire-smoke events “major disasters” worthy of federal relief.
This is a huge oversight.
On Monday, the Center for Biological Diversity, along with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, the Service Employees International Union and dozens of other unions, public-health groups and non-profits, petitioned FEMA to change its policy.
The agency should listen.
“Major disaster” designations for heat and smoke would unlock federal relief money for local governments to prepare for hot weather and wildfire-smoke season by building cooling centers, upgrading public buildings, communicating with elderly and other vulnerable people, and much more. This would save countless lives and billions of dollars in healthcare costs and lost productivity California spent US$800 million on such preparation in 2022, the petition says.
That same year, FEMA rejected the state’s request for federal disaster relief after a heat wave that killed an estimated 395 people.
California, like other US states, must balance its budget every year and has limited funds for such spending. The federal government is under no such constraint.
FEMA itself is underfunded, understaffed and confusingly organized, but the US Congress can help remedy that and US President Joe Biden can (and should) restore FEMA to its former Cabinet-level position to emphasize its growing importance.
Hotboxes like Phoenix, Arizona, that live with the constant threat of extreme temperatures have tried to become more resilient on their own, but the money is tight and the deaths have kept rising.
Moreover, such places are not always the most vulnerable when climate change causes more and deadlier heat waves that increasingly tend to hang around like unwelcome house guests.
The heat dome that camped over the Pacific northwest in 2021 killed an estimated 1,400 people in the US and Canada in a region where most people did not have air-conditioning.
The highest temperatures in this week’s heat wave might be in New England, with New Hampshire possibly hitting 38°C. Parts of Canada will get into the mid-30s. Such places are high on lists of havens from global heating as the zone of human habitability shifts northward in the coming decades, but this week will be a reminder that even these places will not escape the reach of climate change.
Some have argued we should name heat waves like hurricanes to raise awareness. Meteorologist Guy Walton names them after fossil-fuel companies; the heat blob currently menacing the US is Heat Wave Exxon. It is a compelling idea, although the World Meteorological Organization argues that naming heat waves would only confuse people.
For now, the most immediate heat-wave solution is not clever taxonomy, but more urgency and more money.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. He previously worked for Fortune.com, the Huffington Post and the Wall Street Journal. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s