Unlike other natural disasters, extreme heat does not topple buildings, flood streets or turn road signs into missiles. It does not provide a dramatic backdrop for daredevil weather reporters. What it mostly does is kill people, quietly and efficiently.
It is long past time that we respect its destructive power, which will only grow as a warming planet makes heat waves more frequent and intense.
This discussion is particularly relevant this week, as a “heat blob” that has punished Mexico and the southwestern US for months creeps into the US midwest, northeast and Canada, subjecting possibly 150 million people to unseasonably high temperatures for a miserable stretch of days.
For many Americans, a heat wave is just a nuisance. They will sweat through their work clothes and blow out their power bills running the air-conditioning. Roads and sidewalks will buckle. Amtrak and public transportation around New York City will lose their spotless reputations for reliable performance (yes, that was sarcasm) as railroad tracks warp and power lines sag.
However, for hundreds of thousands of people around the world every year, heat is deadly. In the US, it takes more lives than hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes or floods.
It contributed to the deaths of more than 2,300 Americans last year, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the most in 45 years of record-keeping.
The number of such heat-related deaths has more than doubled in just the past five years.
Although this week’s heat wave will have all the hallmarks of a discrete natural disaster like a named hurricane or serious earthquake, including the threat to human life and health, the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will not treat it as such. That is because it does not consider heat waves or wildfire-smoke events “major disasters” worthy of federal relief.
This is a huge oversight.
On Monday, the Center for Biological Diversity, along with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, the Service Employees International Union and dozens of other unions, public-health groups and non-profits, petitioned FEMA to change its policy.
The agency should listen.
“Major disaster” designations for heat and smoke would unlock federal relief money for local governments to prepare for hot weather and wildfire-smoke season by building cooling centers, upgrading public buildings, communicating with elderly and other vulnerable people, and much more. This would save countless lives and billions of dollars in healthcare costs and lost productivity California spent US$800 million on such preparation in 2022, the petition says.
That same year, FEMA rejected the state’s request for federal disaster relief after a heat wave that killed an estimated 395 people.
California, like other US states, must balance its budget every year and has limited funds for such spending. The federal government is under no such constraint.
FEMA itself is underfunded, understaffed and confusingly organized, but the US Congress can help remedy that and US President Joe Biden can (and should) restore FEMA to its former Cabinet-level position to emphasize its growing importance.
Hotboxes like Phoenix, Arizona, that live with the constant threat of extreme temperatures have tried to become more resilient on their own, but the money is tight and the deaths have kept rising.
Moreover, such places are not always the most vulnerable when climate change causes more and deadlier heat waves that increasingly tend to hang around like unwelcome house guests.
The heat dome that camped over the Pacific northwest in 2021 killed an estimated 1,400 people in the US and Canada in a region where most people did not have air-conditioning.
The highest temperatures in this week’s heat wave might be in New England, with New Hampshire possibly hitting 38°C. Parts of Canada will get into the mid-30s. Such places are high on lists of havens from global heating as the zone of human habitability shifts northward in the coming decades, but this week will be a reminder that even these places will not escape the reach of climate change.
Some have argued we should name heat waves like hurricanes to raise awareness. Meteorologist Guy Walton names them after fossil-fuel companies; the heat blob currently menacing the US is Heat Wave Exxon. It is a compelling idea, although the World Meteorological Organization argues that naming heat waves would only confuse people.
For now, the most immediate heat-wave solution is not clever taxonomy, but more urgency and more money.
Mark Gongloff is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change. He previously worked for Fortune.com, the Huffington Post and the Wall Street Journal. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
To The Honorable Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜): We would like to extend our sincerest regards to you for representing Taiwan at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on Monday. The Taiwanese-American community was delighted to see that Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan speaker not only received an invitation to attend the event, but successfully made the trip to the US. We sincerely hope that you took this rare opportunity to share Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development with delegations from other countries. In recent years, Taiwan’s economic growth and world-leading technology industry have been a source of pride for Taiwanese-Americans.
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS