Over the past few decades, Taiwan’s education system has undergone numerous significant reforms to meet the demands of modern society and economic development. The curriculum guidelines play a crucial role in designing curricula, textbooks and entrance examinations.
However, reforms to the guidelines have always been accompanied by considerable controversy.
Unlike previous guidelines, the 108 curriculum primarily emphasizes core competencies and autonomous learning. It encourages students to choose their elective courses and includes learning portfolios as part of the evaluation criteria. This approach aims to help students not only learn in the classroom, but also to discover their interests through clubs and elective courses.
However, the new curriculum has introduced multiple evaluation methods, such as learning portfolios, autonomous learning and cross-disciplinary exams. These requirements mean that students must meet more diverse criteria, leading to increased stress. The multiplicity of evaluations adds layers of complexity to students’ academic life, often resulting in a continuous accumulation of pressure.
One major concern is the resources needed for autonomous learning. These resources, such as tutoring and study materials, are dependent on a family’s financial status, putting less affluent students at a disadvantage. Students from financially constrained backgrounds often lack direction and support in their autonomous learning process, leading to poor learning outcomes and, in some cases, a complete abandonment of the effort.
Furthermore, the exam-centric evaluation approach lacks diversity and flexibility, failing to comprehensively reflect students’ learning achievements. The predominant reliance on exams means that many aspects of a student’s abilities and talents are not adequately assessed. This one-dimensional evaluation method can be particularly disheartening for students who might excel in non-academic areas.
Another significant issue is the time and effort required to prepare learning portfolios. Students must invest a substantial amount of time and energy into compiling these portfolios, which detracts from their ability to focus on regular studies. The inconsistent evaluation standards for these portfolios also create a sense of unfairness among students, as they feel their efforts are not judged on a level playing field.
Teachers have also voiced their concerns about the 108 curriculum guidelines. Many educators argue that the curriculum does not consider the practical realities of the classroom. For example, the autonomous learning and flexible courses proposed often become “ineffective learning” in practice, as students struggle to find direction and frequently submit subpar reports just to meet the requirements.
The emphasis on cross-disciplinary cooperation and mandatory school-specific courses that are not included in major exams further complicates the situation, leading to superficial learning experiences that do not delve deeply into any particular subject.
Educators from different regions have pointed out the disparities in implementation. For instance, urban schools often have better resources and support systems compared with their rural counterparts. This discrepancy exacerbates the inequalities in educational outcomes and opportunities for students across different regions.
Curriculum reform should place greater emphasis on the opinions of educators and learners. By involving teachers and students in the reform process, the guidelines can be more attuned to the needs and realities of the classroom.
There should be a concerted effort to help students find clear learning directions. This can be achieved by providing comprehensive guidance and support systems that help students navigate their educational paths.
Additionally, providing psychological counseling services is crucial to help students cope with the increased stress brought about by the new curriculum. Schools should ensure that students have access to mental health resources to manage their stress and maintain a healthy balance between their academic and personal lives.
Establishing a unified evaluation standard for learning portfolios is essential to ensure fairness and consistency. A clear and transparent evaluation system would help mitigate feelings of injustice and allow students to understand what is expected of them.
By implementing these changes, Taiwan’s curriculum reform can move toward a more equitable and effective educational system that truly meets the needs of all students and prepares them for the challenges of the future.
Lee Pei-chi is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS