Glioblastoma is one of the most common, aggressive and deadly forms of brain cancer. The prognosis — with median survival of 15 to 18 months after diagnosis — has not changed in more than half a century.
A major challenge in treating glioblastoma is that tumors vary widely among patients and the cells within them are not uniform. Too often, selecting the right combination of invasive surgeries, radiation and chemotherapy amounts to high-stakes guesswork.
A “digital twin” of the brain tumor could help. Thanks to the leaps forward in artificial intelligence and mathematical modeling over the past decade, doctors can now create a virtual copy of the affected area in a patient using genetic information, medical records, blood tests and scans.
With a digital twin, doctors can detect abnormalities before physical symptoms emerge, project how tumors would develop, and determine which combination of surgeries and treatments would deliver the best outcomes. Early results have been promising.
Digital twins are at the forefront of a long-awaited era of precision medicine — an important evolution from the one-size-fits-all approach to disease prevention and treatment. Today the technology might still seem closer to science fiction than reality, but with the right support, investment and safeguards, this could change.
The concept of a digital twin is not new. Digital twins have been used for decades in industrial sectors such as aerospace engineering and more recently in auto manufacturing. With blueprints and real-time data from sensors, engineers can approximate performance in extreme conditions — a jet engine in severe weather, for example — and predict maintenance needs.
Although definitions are evolving, digital twins typically require a two-way flow of information: Real-world data from a physical object goes into a model, then the model forecasts outcomes for the real-world object.
The potential uses of digital twins in medicine are wide-ranging. Beyond cancer, digital twins are being used to treat potentially fatal heart arrhythmias and manage Type 1 diabetes. Last year, Blackstone Inc deployed a digital-twin pilot to curb spending on pricey weight-loss drugs for employees; costs fell by half for 160 people enrolled for at least three months.
Scientists also hope to create digital twins for clinical trials for rare diseases and to improve the diversity of patient pools. Simply shrinking the placebo group would speed up trials, significantly cut costs and, hopefully, bring treatments to market quicker.
By some estimates, the digital-twin healthcare market could grow to more than US$20 billion by 2028 from US$1.6 billion today — but there are challenges. Unlike a jet engine, the human body does not have a blueprint, and while doctors collect copious amounts of data from patients, few electronic records systems interconnect.
The first step toward making digital twins mainstream would be getting more, and better, data. Europe, for example, is progressing toward a standard health database. While replicating such efforts would be challenging in the US given a fragmented market, medical engineers should be building digital twins with the goal of making them interoperable across different data systems.
The computing power needed to run such models would require investment. Public-private partnerships, in line with the European Commission’s program to foster collaboration between industry and academia, could help defray costs. In addition, the technology demands new skills, bridging engineering and medicine. Earlier this year, the Chinese government named digital twins one of six “future industries,” and urged labs and research institutions to spend more than half their basic funding on scientists aged 35 or younger.
Privacy concerns will arise. Existing data protections will need to be re-examined and modified. There will be questions around who owns or controls a digital twin, and how diagnoses and treatments using the technology will be priced and paid for. These myriad uncertainties should not be allowed to impede development. The potential benefits are immense.
The Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the