While the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) consistently sends drones to harass military bases in Taiwan’s outlying islands and along the coastline, new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo told the Washington Post that the US military would implement a “Hellscape” strategy involving thousands of uncrewed systems to deter a Chinese invasion.
Josh Rogin, who authored the article which was published on Monday last week, spoke to Paparo on the sidelines of the recent Shangri-La Dialogue defense forum in Singapore.
Paparo told him that as soon as China’s invasion force began to move across the 180km Taiwan Strait, the US military would deploy thousands of uncrewed submarines, surface ships and aerial drones to flood the area and give Taiwanese, US and partner forces time to assemble a full response.
“I want to turn the Taiwan Strait into an unmanned hellscape using a number of classified capabilities,” Paparo said. “So that I can make their [the PLA’s] lives utterly miserable for a month, which buys me the time for the rest of everything.”
A Naval News publication released on Monday analyzing the “hellscape” concept said the US took lessons from Russia’s war on Ukraine, where Ukraine’s deployment of cheap drones had a great effect in repelling Russian advances. Its government since last year has invested in dozens of active programs to develop new uncrewed capabilities, including spending more than US$1 billion on a Replicator Initiative program to build swarms of uncrewed surface ships and aerial drones within the next two years.
Taiwan also has a similar strategy to strengthen deterrence. The Ministry of Defense aims to incorporate uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) into their force buildup plans and produce 7,700 UAVs for military use by 2028, it said in its “Republic of China National Defense Report 2023.”
Taking advantage of the nation’s excellence in information and communication technology, Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that the government would work with private contractors to develop advanced commercial drones for use by the military, such as medium and large military drones and attack drones with military specifications. It also plans to acquire about 1,000 drones equipped with artificial intelligence and machine learning abilities this year, as part of its efforts to bolster the military’s modern combat capabilities, Koo added.
However, China has long been a globally leading country in the mass production of uncrewed vehicles. China’s Da-Jiang Innovations (大疆創新) has become the world’s largest drone maker, supplying more than 70 percent of the world’s consumer drones.
Chinese media reports say the PLA has already established UAV forces for a strategic shift toward drone-led special operations in war scenarios, including a potential conflict with the US over Taiwan.
With China aiming to have the capability to invade Taiwan by 2027, the major and urgent challenges faced by the nation, the US and like-minded allies should be to address funding shortages and increase the capacity for the mass production of UAVs.
It is difficult, but also necessary to remove influence from the Chinese supply chain, since a growing number of Taiwanese and US UAVs have been found to be equipped with components made in China.
Taiwan should also accelerate the buildup of its special forces and facilities for UAV-related warfare, not only to be able to practice UAV operations, but also to fight against the PLA’s UAV attacks and harassment, which have increased rapidly this year.
Setting up a hellscape defense in the Taiwan Strait to deter and break through China’s likely ploy to overwhelm Taiwan with a massive attack, takes not only tens of thousands of UAVs, but also a lot of talented personnel, skilled at asymmetric warfare tactics and strategies.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS