While the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) consistently sends drones to harass military bases in Taiwan’s outlying islands and along the coastline, new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo told the Washington Post that the US military would implement a “Hellscape” strategy involving thousands of uncrewed systems to deter a Chinese invasion.
Josh Rogin, who authored the article which was published on Monday last week, spoke to Paparo on the sidelines of the recent Shangri-La Dialogue defense forum in Singapore.
Paparo told him that as soon as China’s invasion force began to move across the 180km Taiwan Strait, the US military would deploy thousands of uncrewed submarines, surface ships and aerial drones to flood the area and give Taiwanese, US and partner forces time to assemble a full response.
“I want to turn the Taiwan Strait into an unmanned hellscape using a number of classified capabilities,” Paparo said. “So that I can make their [the PLA’s] lives utterly miserable for a month, which buys me the time for the rest of everything.”
A Naval News publication released on Monday analyzing the “hellscape” concept said the US took lessons from Russia’s war on Ukraine, where Ukraine’s deployment of cheap drones had a great effect in repelling Russian advances. Its government since last year has invested in dozens of active programs to develop new uncrewed capabilities, including spending more than US$1 billion on a Replicator Initiative program to build swarms of uncrewed surface ships and aerial drones within the next two years.
Taiwan also has a similar strategy to strengthen deterrence. The Ministry of Defense aims to incorporate uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) into their force buildup plans and produce 7,700 UAVs for military use by 2028, it said in its “Republic of China National Defense Report 2023.”
Taking advantage of the nation’s excellence in information and communication technology, Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that the government would work with private contractors to develop advanced commercial drones for use by the military, such as medium and large military drones and attack drones with military specifications. It also plans to acquire about 1,000 drones equipped with artificial intelligence and machine learning abilities this year, as part of its efforts to bolster the military’s modern combat capabilities, Koo added.
However, China has long been a globally leading country in the mass production of uncrewed vehicles. China’s Da-Jiang Innovations (大疆創新) has become the world’s largest drone maker, supplying more than 70 percent of the world’s consumer drones.
Chinese media reports say the PLA has already established UAV forces for a strategic shift toward drone-led special operations in war scenarios, including a potential conflict with the US over Taiwan.
With China aiming to have the capability to invade Taiwan by 2027, the major and urgent challenges faced by the nation, the US and like-minded allies should be to address funding shortages and increase the capacity for the mass production of UAVs.
It is difficult, but also necessary to remove influence from the Chinese supply chain, since a growing number of Taiwanese and US UAVs have been found to be equipped with components made in China.
Taiwan should also accelerate the buildup of its special forces and facilities for UAV-related warfare, not only to be able to practice UAV operations, but also to fight against the PLA’s UAV attacks and harassment, which have increased rapidly this year.
Setting up a hellscape defense in the Taiwan Strait to deter and break through China’s likely ploy to overwhelm Taiwan with a massive attack, takes not only tens of thousands of UAVs, but also a lot of talented personnel, skilled at asymmetric warfare tactics and strategies.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS