Five decades after electronics gained a toehold in Malaysia and helped drive years of stellar growth, leaders are again putting their faith in chips. Artificial intelligence (AI) and the competition to present as the most friendly destination for investment, stands to give the place a much needed lift. Once seen as a template for developing economies, the country now contends with a slower expansion and fractious politics. The trick would be sorting the AI hype from the substance — and whether Malaysia can avoid some own goals.
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim recently made his pitch. The government promised 25 billion ringgit (US$5.3 billion) to support the semiconductor industry. Anwar nodded to a long-standing challenge, which is the need to graduate from a center for assembly and testing to more lucrative areas such as design.
The premier is also betting that Malaysia, one of the biggest chip exporters to the US, but with a history of cordial ties to China, can be a player in an era when supply chains are increasingly sorted along national security lines.
“I offer our nation as the most neutral and non-aligned location,” he said.
The mania for most things AI, and a couple of pledges from technology icons, is generating good press. An educated workforce, relatively low costs and proximity to Singapore has companies singing Malaysia’s praises in the way they did during the glory days of former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, who ruled with a strong hand, but recognized the need to make life easy for big multinationals.
Microsoft Corp chairman Satya Nadella last month vowed US$2.2 billion to build digital infrastructure. Meanwhile, YTL Power International Bhd became a market darling after it announced a venture with Nvidia Corp for a US$4.3 billion data center in the southern state of Johor.
The enthusiasm for Malaysia led me to recall the history of Penang, an island in the north of the country. On visits there, I was always struck by the reverence for Intel Corp, and its early leaders Gordon Moore and Andrew Grove.
They came to the place when it had a port, fantastic seafood and not a whole lot more, although it did have a state administration eager to promote development.
Intel opened its first assembly and testing business outside the US in 1972, and the place is still a major hub for the company. Chips are now almost everything to Penang, which residents have come to call Silicon Island. Large-scale dredging and land reclamation are underway to add space for more industrial parks.
So, is AI and a new wave of technology investment going to give Malaysia its mojo back?
GDP rose at an average of about 4 percent in the past decade, markedly slower than the heady days of 1990s and early 2000s. The federation also offered stability; one party dominated from independence through 2018. That was followed by rickety coalitions and a succession of leaders until Anwar forged a government of national unity in late 2022. It is anybody’s guess whether this team can last a full, five-year term.
The investment that flocked to Penang became a template for development and urbanization, as factory workers moved from rural villages to urban centers.
The trend was repeated throughout emerging markets. To keep the money coming, nations had to invest heavily in education and infrastructure, and develop regulatory regimes that supported this. Growth was there to be had, and societies were radically transformed.
Malaysia today is on the cusp of becoming a high-income nation, but is crawling across the finish line.
Another challenge: Southeast Asia’s semiconductor scene is concentrated around assembly, testing and packaging.
“Although the rise of AI offers vast business opportunities and growth potential for the semiconductor industry, the benefits are not evenly distributed along the chain,” Oxford Economics economist Sunny Liu wrote in a report. “As long as ASEAN countries remain focused on [assembly, testing and packaging] ATP, the benefits they derive will be limited compared to economies engaged in design and fabrication.”
The idea of neutrality, as framed by Anwar, is also a stretch. The clamor for a slice of the AI pie might bind countries more tightly to the US, or at least the US’ West Coast.
Diplomats might mouth bromides about not wanting to pick sides, but decision-by-decision officials would probably align with one camp more than the other. Straddling Washington and Beijing, something at which Malaysia has excelled, gets harder.
The country is right to woo AI. It cannot let growth slow too far, nor afford to let neighbors steal a march. Let us have some realism; mistakes have been made, and would again. Malaysia can talk a big game and not always come through.
Bad luck can also play a role. Mahathir began to develop plans for the Multimedia Super Corridor in 1996, a technology zone that stretched from Kuala Lumpur, through the new administrative capital and down to the airport. Then the nation endured a massive electricity failure. The premier was humiliated.
Anwar would be hoping a different historical analogy prevails. In 1975, a few years into Intel’s presence in Penang, a fire destroyed a huge part of the facility. Employees were determined to press on and fill orders. They were given T-shirts emblazoned with the words: “Intel Still Delivers.”
If Malaysia is in the market for a rally cry, it could do worse than emulate that sentiment.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor for economics at Bloomberg News.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS