Five decades after electronics gained a toehold in Malaysia and helped drive years of stellar growth, leaders are again putting their faith in chips. Artificial intelligence (AI) and the competition to present as the most friendly destination for investment, stands to give the place a much needed lift. Once seen as a template for developing economies, the country now contends with a slower expansion and fractious politics. The trick would be sorting the AI hype from the substance — and whether Malaysia can avoid some own goals.
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim recently made his pitch. The government promised 25 billion ringgit (US$5.3 billion) to support the semiconductor industry. Anwar nodded to a long-standing challenge, which is the need to graduate from a center for assembly and testing to more lucrative areas such as design.
The premier is also betting that Malaysia, one of the biggest chip exporters to the US, but with a history of cordial ties to China, can be a player in an era when supply chains are increasingly sorted along national security lines.
“I offer our nation as the most neutral and non-aligned location,” he said.
The mania for most things AI, and a couple of pledges from technology icons, is generating good press. An educated workforce, relatively low costs and proximity to Singapore has companies singing Malaysia’s praises in the way they did during the glory days of former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, who ruled with a strong hand, but recognized the need to make life easy for big multinationals.
Microsoft Corp chairman Satya Nadella last month vowed US$2.2 billion to build digital infrastructure. Meanwhile, YTL Power International Bhd became a market darling after it announced a venture with Nvidia Corp for a US$4.3 billion data center in the southern state of Johor.
The enthusiasm for Malaysia led me to recall the history of Penang, an island in the north of the country. On visits there, I was always struck by the reverence for Intel Corp, and its early leaders Gordon Moore and Andrew Grove.
They came to the place when it had a port, fantastic seafood and not a whole lot more, although it did have a state administration eager to promote development.
Intel opened its first assembly and testing business outside the US in 1972, and the place is still a major hub for the company. Chips are now almost everything to Penang, which residents have come to call Silicon Island. Large-scale dredging and land reclamation are underway to add space for more industrial parks.
So, is AI and a new wave of technology investment going to give Malaysia its mojo back?
GDP rose at an average of about 4 percent in the past decade, markedly slower than the heady days of 1990s and early 2000s. The federation also offered stability; one party dominated from independence through 2018. That was followed by rickety coalitions and a succession of leaders until Anwar forged a government of national unity in late 2022. It is anybody’s guess whether this team can last a full, five-year term.
The investment that flocked to Penang became a template for development and urbanization, as factory workers moved from rural villages to urban centers.
The trend was repeated throughout emerging markets. To keep the money coming, nations had to invest heavily in education and infrastructure, and develop regulatory regimes that supported this. Growth was there to be had, and societies were radically transformed.
Malaysia today is on the cusp of becoming a high-income nation, but is crawling across the finish line.
Another challenge: Southeast Asia’s semiconductor scene is concentrated around assembly, testing and packaging.
“Although the rise of AI offers vast business opportunities and growth potential for the semiconductor industry, the benefits are not evenly distributed along the chain,” Oxford Economics economist Sunny Liu wrote in a report. “As long as ASEAN countries remain focused on [assembly, testing and packaging] ATP, the benefits they derive will be limited compared to economies engaged in design and fabrication.”
The idea of neutrality, as framed by Anwar, is also a stretch. The clamor for a slice of the AI pie might bind countries more tightly to the US, or at least the US’ West Coast.
Diplomats might mouth bromides about not wanting to pick sides, but decision-by-decision officials would probably align with one camp more than the other. Straddling Washington and Beijing, something at which Malaysia has excelled, gets harder.
The country is right to woo AI. It cannot let growth slow too far, nor afford to let neighbors steal a march. Let us have some realism; mistakes have been made, and would again. Malaysia can talk a big game and not always come through.
Bad luck can also play a role. Mahathir began to develop plans for the Multimedia Super Corridor in 1996, a technology zone that stretched from Kuala Lumpur, through the new administrative capital and down to the airport. Then the nation endured a massive electricity failure. The premier was humiliated.
Anwar would be hoping a different historical analogy prevails. In 1975, a few years into Intel’s presence in Penang, a fire destroyed a huge part of the facility. Employees were determined to press on and fill orders. They were given T-shirts emblazoned with the words: “Intel Still Delivers.”
If Malaysia is in the market for a rally cry, it could do worse than emulate that sentiment.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor for economics at Bloomberg News.
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises. China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come. The purpose of excluding China is primarily
War in the Middle East, global terrorism and the Ukraine war pose significant threats to the global economy. However, according to Global Guardian, a leading security solutions firm, a conflict between China and Taiwan would cause the greatest disruption since World War II. Its Taiwan Shock Index (TSI) analyzes the potential global impacts of such a war. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) rhetoric about rejuvenating the People’s Republic of China heavily emphasizes “reunification” with Taiwan. Experts differ on when this might happen. Some point to 2027, the centenary of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), as a symbolic and strategic milestone. Others
Many local news media last week reported that COVID-19 is back, citing doctors’ observations and the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) statistics. The CDC said that cases would peak this month and urged people to take preventive measures. Although COVID-19 has never been eliminated, it has become more manageable, and restrictions were dropped, enabling people to return to their normal way of life due to decreasing hospitalizations and deaths. In Taiwan, mandatory reporting of confirmed cases and home isolation ended in March last year, while the mask mandate at hospitals and healthcare facilities stopped in May. However, the CDC last week said the number