Punish the betrayers
This year marks 100 years since the founding of the Whampoa Military Academy (黃埔軍校), forerunner of today’s Republic of China (ROC) Military Academy. To mark the occasion, grand commemorative ceremonies have been organized on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Chi Lin-lien (季麟連), a former chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Huang Fu-hsing (黃復興) branch, stirred up controversy when he went to China to take part in their commemorative activities.
To the knowledge of the Veterans Affairs Council, only a small number of retired generals were going to China, rather than a delegation, ROC Army Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Chen Chien-yi (陳建義) said. He warned those concerned not to fall for China’s cognitive warfare and “united front” strategy.
The rivalry between China and Taiwan about who the legitimate heir of the Whampoa Academy is, is meaningless, because the two are independent political entities. It is their own business how they celebrate the anniversary of their respective national military academies, and there is no need to compare them.
China using this opportunity to invite retired Taiwanese generals to take part in its celebrations is clearly intended to use those retirees as model figures for its “united front” strategy. It is disgraceful for veterans to insist on going when they know they are being used.
Imagine if retired Chinese generals were to come to Taiwan and take part in a military academy celebration or other political activities. Could they go back to China? If they went back, they would be severely punished or even shot.
How can Taiwan’s retired generals so openly go to China to participate in military celebrations while the two sides are still technically engaged in military hostilities? Is their behavior not tantamount to going over to the other side just for a pat on the head?
Military authorities and the Veterans Affairs Commission should tell retired generals not to take part in military or political activities in China.
If those retirees do not heed this advice, they should be punished in accordance with relevant laws, such as deducting their pensions or taking their pensions away altogether. This would ensure that retired generals who step out of line lose more than they gain.
Tien Fong-wen
New Taipei City
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s