Major figures from Google, Nvidia and AMD converged in Taipei early this month and announced plans to boost their investments in Taiwan — now a global production powerhouse for artificial intelligence (AI) technology, drawing attention from across the globe. However, Taiwan must still contend with opposition parties’ expansion of power, damaging of the nation’s democratic and human rights systems, and its impact on Taiwan’s image abroad. The hobbling of democratic institutions, and the impact on the government and the international community’s perception of Taiwanese democracy could affect foreign investment.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is pairing up with the Executive Yuan to propose a review of controversial bills. On Friday last week, the DPP launched a nationwide “oppose abuse of power, let the public lead” drive to help the public understand how the bills impact their rights and interests, and the effective operation of institutions and the government.
Civic groups could make strong inroads by holding discussions and forums, opening town hall meetings, and utilizing social media forums and online media to explain why the Executive Yuan has requested a reconsideration of the bills that would expand the Legislative Yuan’s power, and how such legislation would harm human rights and hamper the government’s ability to govern. Movements such as the Bluebird movement could consolidate civic strength against opposition party oppression, compel a review of the legislation and lead to the bills’ recension.
If the legislature rejects the call for a review, civic groups should support the Executive Yuan and the DPP’s request for a constitutional interpretation of the laws, and initiate recall petitions for malicious lawmakers. For the latter to succeed, civic groups should carefully build their case based on solid reasoning. The goal should be to elevate the quality of government inquiry.
Discourse surrounding recalls should redefine how these amendments are disturbing society and damaging the government, and how they would impact national development, human rights and interests. Before recalls can take place in February next year, there is about eight months to get the ball rolling. Civic groups ought to continue entrenching civic movements, transforming them from recall drives to social movements that promote civic education. They could set the foundation for exceptional, democratically governed structures that would allow the public to handily veto these amendments should they go through a public referendum.
To achieve the goal of civic education, civic groups should hold intensive seminars, speeches, televised media and stage performances, to get society to understand the power of local factions and networks, and that those holding vested interests would harm the public’s rights and interests, the development of local industries and the quality of public infrastructure.
An excellent democratic government cannot have ties to corrupt local power, factions or vested interests at any level. It should respect the development of local industries and the nation’s economy, promote public infrastructure, and expound progressive values and reformist mindsets. It should cast off traditional patronage networks and factions, and the intertwining of interpersonal patronage relationships and influential local officials. It should establish an excellent public society.
By holding talks and forums across the nation, the DPP could elevate the quality of Taiwanese democracy. To deepen democracy, the DPP could follow the lead of the civic groups such as the Bluebird movement, bolstering cooperation and support, and divide and conquer.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat, formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Tim Smith
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS