I once described independent Legislator May Chin (高金素梅) as a “well-paid spokesperson of dictator [Chinese President] Xi Jinping (習近平)” — a judgement some of my friends claimed to be arbitrary.
However, when it comes to character assessment, I follow Confucius’ (孔子) precepts: “Watch what they do and observe how they do it. How can they conceal their true self?”
During a questioning session in the Legislative Yuan, my suspicions were confirmed when Chin unabashedly referred to the Chinese president as “our Xi Jinping.”
While UK-US relations are amicable, it would be unfathomable for a US Congressperson to say “our King Charles III.” However, a Taiwanese legislator used “our” to express affinity with Xi — the head of a hostile state intent on annexing Taiwan.
That reminds me of a pro-unification colleague at Shih Hsin University, Wang Hsiao-po (王曉波). At a meeting in Beijing, he said: “We gave Taiwan great terms for the ‘one country, two systems’ principle, and yet they rejected it!” He was clearly taking the stance of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as the “we” he referred to could certainly not be Taiwan.
Born in Guizhou, China, one might understand how Wang came to develop a “China complex.” However, for Taiwan-born Chin, refusing to stand with Taiwan and sacrificing the interests of indigenous peoples to the CCP is the height of hypocrisy. Perhaps personal profit or a Chinese nationalist education swayed her to it.
On a Taiwanese history general knowledge test, when asked: “During WWII, which country bombed Taiwan?” 30 percent of my students incorrectly answered “Japan.”
“Taiwan was a Japanese colony, why would Japan attack its own territory?” I retorted.
A student replied: “Didn’t we fight Japan for eight years?”
The root issue was revealed: The student’s “we” was taken from China’s viewpoint rather than Taiwan’s. This is the result of “de-Taiwanization” education policies implemented by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). With Chinese perspectives consistently prioritized over Taiwanese history, students are misled into a Sino-centric narrative.
Below are three instances of lingering Chinese nationalism:
When paying homage to the CCP, retired army general Chen Ting-chung (陳廷寵) cursed those who supported Taiwanese independence, calling them “the scum of the Chinese nation.”
Former National Defense University principal Hsia Ying-chou (夏瀛洲) said: “Both the People’s Liberation Army and the Republic of China Armed Forces are Chinese armies.”
Former KMT Huang Fu-hsing branch legislator Tsang You-hsia (臧幼俠) said: “I would rather unify with the CCP than submit to the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP].”
As “Mainlanders” who are not originally from Taiwan, their reactions are unsurprising. Entrapped in the myth of Chinese nationalism, they lack values of democracy, freedom and human rights — let alone any sense of Taiwanese identity.
However, it becomes concerning when Taiwanese share similar views. A friend recently recounted a story from a trip to Tibet, where a businessman from Tainan told the local tour guide: “[President] William Lai’s (賴清德) presidency will solidify Taiwanese identity. We must quickly reunite Taiwan with China!”
Such sentiments from profit-driven businesspeople willing to sell out Taiwan are loathsome.
Yet, there are some instances where my faith in a shared Taiwanese identity is restored. DPP Legislator Saidhai Tahovecahe (伍麗華) shared such a story with me.
During a “Patriot Week” assembly in a Pingtung County primary school, the principal addressed the students: “It’s Patriot Week, and we all love our country. And what is the name of our country?”
“Taiwan!” all students replied in unison.
“Yes, we are Taiwan, but we are also the Republic of China,” he added, awkwardly attempting to smooth things over.
Lee Hsiao-feng is an honorary professor at National Taipei University of Education.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS