The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on June 6 reported the first instance of a member of a Taiwanese tour group traveling in China being detained for several days by Chinese authorities, and warned Taiwanese to carefully assess whether traveling to China is necessary and to be vigilant about personal safety.
The person was detained because they had worked in a “sensitive” profession before retirement, local media cited anonymous sources as saying.
The case was revealed only a day after another Taiwanese man, surnamed Lin (林), posted on Threads that when he displayed his photo books at an arts and books exhibition in Nanjing on May 31, he was taken away for interrogation by Chinese police. They handcuffed him, forced him to remove his clothes, took his fingerprints and a blood sample, and asked personal questions about his family and sexual orientation, before releasing him at midnight.
BBC News Chinese reported that the police told Lin he was put under administrative detention for allegedly selling obscene images.
The MAC has repeatedly told the public to avoid unnecessary visits to China, saying that its expanded national security laws, including an updated counterespionage law and its revised state secrets law, expanded the definition of “sensitive information,” but is “highly vague” and could mean people might be breaking the law at any time.
The Straits Exchange Foundation in August last year also said that there are many differences between the legal systems of Taiwan and China, and what is ordinary in Taiwan might be deemed illegal in China, so visitors should make adequate preparations and be aware of personal safety risks before traveling to China.
That view is shared with several countries.
The US Department of State issued a level 3 travel advisory for China in 2020, which is still in place, which states: “Reconsider travel due to the arbitrary enforcement of local laws, including in relation to exit bans, and the risk of wrongful detentions.”
The UK’s travel advice for China also says that China’s authorities have detained foreign nationals who break national security laws, that “national security” and “national interest” could be interpreted broadly, and that “activity that happened outside of China — including online activity — could fall under the scope of mainland legislation” and “there is a risk of arbitrary detention.”
While cases of arbitrary arrests of Taiwanese in China have been reported multiple times, including democracy advocates Lee Ming-che (李明哲), Lee Meng-chu (李孟居) and Yang Chih-yuan (楊智淵), many Taiwanese remain unconcerned, as they do not believe they would be targeted as long as they are not high-profile political activists and do not commit obvious crimes.
Many comments on reports about Taiwanese detained in China were also uncompassionate, with people online saying they have never encountered any trouble in China, so it must be due to the victims’ immoral behavior or criminal activities.
The public’s overconfidence is concerning, as other cases have proven that foreigners in China have been interrogated on a wide range of issues or detained by Chinese authorities for allegedly breaching its national security laws.
An I-Kuan Tao (一貫道, a salvationist religion) follower was also detained last year for bringing books promoting vegetarianism to China.
If many Taiwanese are becoming numb to the repeated warnings, in the same way many are becoming used to China’s daily military activities near Taiwan, or are wrapped up in a false sense of security from pro-China politicians and influencers promoting China’s friendliness to the world, then the government might need to rethink its approach to informing the public of the risks of going to or staying in China.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises