A splintering of global supply chains, driven by political and business considerations, has hundreds of manufacturers and logistics providers debating where to go next. They would be well advised to take their cues from two Taiwanese companies who have led the charge.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) is the world’s largest maker of chips, with clients including Apple Inc, Nvidia Corp and Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Foxconn Technology Group, whose flagship is Taipei-based Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, assembles those components into end devices. Apple’s iPhones and Nvidia’s artificial intelligence servers are among the most famous of Foxconn’s products, but its reach extends into industrial sectors including Tesla Inc cars, factory-automation systems provider Siemens AG and even an Israeli satellite maker.
Illustration: Constance Chou
Their size, technical dominance and global influence make these two Taiwanese companies irreplaceable — no other single business could jump in to fill the gap should either disappear overnight. That is the concern policymakers from Washington to Canberra have in the event tensions between Taipei and Beijing escalate to the point of military conflict.
However, both firms are thinking less about war and more about how globalization can extend their lead.
“Instability in the Taiwan Strait is definitely one supply chain-resilience consideration,” TSMC chairman and chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said after its annual shareholder meeting this month. Yet the chipmaker also seen benefits from globalization “because we can get the best from around the world.”
Foxconn has also been touting the upside of its expanded reach. “Our diversified global footprint is an important part of Hon Hai’s competitive advantage,” chief executive officer Young Liu (劉揚偉) told shareholders recently, adding that it has 205 sites in 24 countries. “In the current geopolitical situation, that advantage is even more important and obvious.”
Two decades after joining the WTO, China’s position as factory to the world has shifted from being a win-win for clients and suppliers to a massive risk. Labor shortages, rising costs and stiff local competition have many looking elsewhere. Japanese and South Korean carmakers are withdrawing, US power-tool maker Stanley Black & Decker shut its factory, and Nike Inc has moved away.
TSMC and Foxconn do not supply directly to all of these companies, but they are only one step away. Almost every device on the planet is made with, or by, the goods that come out of their factories. TSMC, for example, not only controls most production of leading-edge chips, it is the single largest supplier of older (also called legacy) 28-nanometer semiconductors that go into toys, and industrial and agricultural equipment. Foxconn, though best known for churning out consumer devices, is a major player in industrial manufacturing and factory automation.
That means the site of new facilities from either company act as a guidepost for where the rest of the supply chain is already going, or ought to move next.
Take TSMC. Although it does not make cars, the company has chosen locations at the center of the automotive supply chain. Volkswagen AG, BMW AG and Porsche all have facilities near Dresden, the site of TSMC’s forthcoming European fab. Co-investors in that factory include Robert Bosch GmbH, Infineon Technologies AG and NXP Semiconductors NV. As a result, anyone who wants to supply materials or equipment to TSMC would need to have operations near the German city.
For its factory in Japan’s Kumamoto Prefecture, TSMC is teaming up with Sony Group Corp, Toyota Motor Corp and automotive-electronics supplier Denso Corp. This facility would serve Japan’s world-leading carmaking, industrial and consumer electronics industries. The expansion plan, announced in 2021, spurred suppliers Mitsubishi Electric Corp, Sumco Corp and Kyocera Corp to outline new investments in the area.
TSMC’s facility in Arizona is a different story. There is no business case to be made for setting up there: The region lacks any related industries of note. However, pressure from clients, and incentives from US governments at the state and federal level, left the Taiwanese company little choice. Even then, suppliers were quick to follow, including industrial companies LCY Chemical Corp and Topco Scientific Co.
Foxconn’s decision to expand in Mexico, India and Southeast Asia as well as numerous tie-ups with European industrial companies like Siemens, ZF Group and Stellantis NV show that its diversification is not only geographic but also sector-based. The company is pushing into factory automation, transportation and logistics, aerospace and alternative energy. Many of its current vendors built facilities in Shenzhen to enjoy the benefits of being close to China’s manufacturing heartland.
This Foxconn effect was repeated over a decade ago when it set up near central China’s Zhengzhou city and suppliers followed suit.
Now, because of their crucial role at the center of industry, not only would the same entourage of vendors to TSMC and Foxconn need to tag along on their global journey, anyone else expecting to be part of international supply chains would have no choice but to follow, too.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
RSS