After reading an opinion piece in the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), titled “Police officer risks his life, but gets a Grade B in his performance evaluation, showing the absurdity of the evaluation system for civil servants,” I share the same feelings.
I started my service as a military officer after I graduated from a military academy, and I never received a “demerit” or “warning.” My performance evaluation was consistently at least Grade A, year in and year out. This means I was always able to receive an extra one-month bonus annually.
A limit is placed on the percentage of evaluations graded “Excellent” (higher than Grade A) or above, but there is no limit on the percentage of Grade A evaluations or below, the Regulations on Performance Evaluations for Officers, Non-Commissioned Officers and Volunteer Soldiers of the Armed Forces (國軍志願役軍官士官及志願士兵考績作業規定) say. This means that as long as you have not made a big mistake in over a year, your evaluation result would be at least a Grade A, and you could obtain the bonus.
This is not the case for Taiwan’s civil servants. Civil servants are subject to the “25 percent Grade B” minimum by law. Although supervisors evaluate their staff every year, such assessments are neither objective nor fair. No supervisor wants to be the bad guy, so in some units there might be strange internal rules for performance reviews, such as issuing only a Grade B to newcomers in their first three years of service.
Given this, many newcomers see little point in working hard for the first few years, because they get a Grade B irrespective of how hard they work.
There was a Yunlin County police officer who sustained a head injury while trying to protect the chief of his police station. As he was still a rookie at the station, he got a Grade B in his performance evaluation.
Some organizations have also stipulated that if civil servants want to take leave in accordance with the Leave Rules for Civil Servants (公務人員請假規則) — such as sick leave, bereavement leave or paternity leave — or the Gender Equality in Employment Act (性別平等工作法), such as a menstrual leave, they must use their annual leave or risk receiving a Grade B, which would reduce their annual bonus by half.
Therefore, although many female civil servants might feel uncomfortable during their periods, they endure the pain and force themselves to work for fear of losing half of their bonus. Some civil servants do not even dare take funeral leave when their parents die.
The performance evaluation system for civil servants’ reviews should follow the system for military officers. After all, most civil servants are hardworking, law-abiding people.
Those who perform poorly and contravene the law deserve a Grade B or lower, but the rest of them deserve at least a Grade A or higher, and a one-month bonus seems reasonable.
By doing so, civil servants would be encouraged to devote themselves to their work, and strive to perform better.
Chen Hung-hui is a counselor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Deterrence is fading; war is looming on the Taiwan Strait and for other targets of the China-enabled dictatorship alliance, and after three years the cure is just dawning on the Biden Administration. Now mind you, for a May 28, 2024 interview with Time magazine, President Joe Biden made his 5th public commitment that the United States would defend Taiwan. Less than three weeks later the United States Navy, along with ships from navies of Japan, Canada, the Netherlands, and France, were conducting the Valiant Shield joint force exercise in the Philippine Sea south of Taiwan and in the South China Sea to
The official media of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) reacted to the May 20 inauguration speech of President William Lai (賴清德) by asserting: “Lai’s words reveal his true intention of sacrificing peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait for his own desire for power.” This baseless accusation by Beijing that Lai is manipulating Taiwanese to resist unification with China for his personal gain, is part of a broader CCP information warfare campaign that has intensified since Lai’s election. This campaign, orchestrated by the United Front Work Department, the CCP’s agency for coordinating influence operations and propaganda, aims to demoralize Taiwanese,
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) on Friday said the ministry supports keeping priority seats on public transportation, but is considering expanding the eligibility criteria and renaming the seats. Chiu’s remarks came after local news media over the past few weeks reported incidents involving priority seats, once again sparking heated discussion about whether the seats should be abolished or regulations regarding them should be revised. On June 11, an older woman asked a young woman on a Taipei MRT train to yield her priority seat. The young woman refused, saying that she needed the seat after working a 12-hour shift.