Political responsibility
The Executive Yuan on Thursday last week sent amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) and revisions of the Criminal Code back to lawmakers for reconsideration. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) responded by asking if Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) would step down should the request for reconsideration fail.
I believe Cho would have been prepared to accept the possible outcome of resignation, but I cannot help but ask, would legislators in the blue and white camp have been prepared to accept the implications of their actions?
Taiwan is governed by the rule of law. Politicians need not resort to confrontational methods. So long as issues are handled according to the law, it does not matter who can shout the loudest. Moreover, as stipulated by Article 3 Clause 2 Section 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China, “Should the Executive Yuan deem a statutory, budgetary, or treaty bill passed by the Legislative Yuan difficult to execute, the Executive Yuan may, with the approval of the president of the Republic and within 10 days of the bill’s submission to the Executive Yuan, request the Legislative Yuan to reconsider the bill.”
Of course, the legislature could also cite Section 3 to propose a no-confidence vote against the premier. If the no-confidence vote were to pass, the premier would be required to tender his resignation within 10 days and simultaneously request for the president to dissolve the Legislative Yuan.
In politics, duty must not be neglected. The manner and behavior of politicians and the policies they adopt should originate from a sense of duty to the public.
The Executive Yuan’s actions exhibit the government’s firm conviction and feeling of duty in its approach to policy. Even in the wake of criticism and pressure from all sides, they have upheld their position and courageously bore their responsibility.
If the reform bill passed by the legislators of the blue and white camps is truly a step in the right direction, should they not also have the courage to bear political responsibility and face the possibility of dissolution and a new election?
Hsieh Chih-chieh
Taipei
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s