Political responsibility
The Executive Yuan on Thursday last week sent amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) and revisions of the Criminal Code back to lawmakers for reconsideration. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) responded by asking if Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) would step down should the request for reconsideration fail.
I believe Cho would have been prepared to accept the possible outcome of resignation, but I cannot help but ask, would legislators in the blue and white camp have been prepared to accept the implications of their actions?
Taiwan is governed by the rule of law. Politicians need not resort to confrontational methods. So long as issues are handled according to the law, it does not matter who can shout the loudest. Moreover, as stipulated by Article 3 Clause 2 Section 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China, “Should the Executive Yuan deem a statutory, budgetary, or treaty bill passed by the Legislative Yuan difficult to execute, the Executive Yuan may, with the approval of the president of the Republic and within 10 days of the bill’s submission to the Executive Yuan, request the Legislative Yuan to reconsider the bill.”
Of course, the legislature could also cite Section 3 to propose a no-confidence vote against the premier. If the no-confidence vote were to pass, the premier would be required to tender his resignation within 10 days and simultaneously request for the president to dissolve the Legislative Yuan.
In politics, duty must not be neglected. The manner and behavior of politicians and the policies they adopt should originate from a sense of duty to the public.
The Executive Yuan’s actions exhibit the government’s firm conviction and feeling of duty in its approach to policy. Even in the wake of criticism and pressure from all sides, they have upheld their position and courageously bore their responsibility.
If the reform bill passed by the legislators of the blue and white camps is truly a step in the right direction, should they not also have the courage to bear political responsibility and face the possibility of dissolution and a new election?
Hsieh Chih-chieh
Taipei
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS