Russia’s standing in the international community — from economic pariah to massive supplier of fossil fuels — seems perfectly suited to the predicament faced by traditional Chinese automakers. In fact, sanctions against Moscow are likely the single-largest driver of vehicle exports from its neighbor since the invasion of Ukraine began more than two years ago.
As China’s economy slows and buyers are increasingly choosing electric vehicles (EV), makers of old-school internal-combustion-engine (ICE) cars had become desperate to find new markets. The US is off the table amid an escalating trade war, and the EU’s appetite for foreign models is fading, leaving few good choices after Russia’s attack on Ukraine spurred overseas companies to ditch the country.
“Western sanctions on Russia have created a major market opportunity for China’s internal combustion engine auto sector, providing a lifeline to the industry and deepening Russia’s dependence on Chinese goods,” Gerard DiPippo and Alexander Isakov of Bloomberg Economics wrote last month.
They estimated 58 percent of the increase in the nation’s ICE exports since 2021 went to Russia last year. While most of that trade flows directly across the border, some also go via transshipment intermediaries, including Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkey.
Moscow and Beijing have a lot in common. They both feel under siege from the West, show a willingness to interrupt the international order, and face an existential need to wean themselves off foreign supply chains.
While local brand Lada, owned by AvtoVAZ PJSC, still topped the market and increased its share past 30 percent, the next six-largest players last year were all from China, displacing South Korea’s Kia Motors Corp and Hyundai Motor Co and Japan’s Toyota Motor Corp, data from Autostat.ru showed. Chery Automobile Co was the biggest winner. Its unit sales in Russia jumped threefold, taking 11 percent of the market. Haval, a brand under Great Wall Motor Co, saw a similar increase in scale with its Jolion crossover SUV the most-popular foreign model on the market. That growth in Russia is welcome news for Great Wall: The company last month shut down its European headquarters in Munich as it failed to gain traction on the continent.
Chinese automakers face a struggle. Some of their existing equipment can be switched to making electrified models, particularly chassis and interiors, but a lot cannot. Engines, and related components such as gearboxes and drive shafts, would face softening demand from an increasing uptake in EVs. Yet the capacity for these parts remains, hence the need to find foreign markets. Russia is particularly well suited because buyers there have shunned EVs.
Last year, gasoline-powered vehicles’ share of the auto market actually rose, to 93.7 percent from 91.6 percent, according to Autostat.ru, with diesel and hybrid models adding to the fossil-fuel mix. Pure EVs accounted for just 1.3 percent of the market.
That might not be good news for EV makers, or the planet, but these holdouts are exactly what China’s traditional automakers need at a time of excess capacity and a long-term shift toward new-energy models.
However, the dilemma for Beijing would be how to manage escalating demands from Moscow that suppliers move production to Russia if they want to keep selling into the market. China’s economic slowdown, weakening exports and overcapacity has policymakers searching for ways to prop up employment and keep factories humming. They would not be keen to see jobs and production head abroad.
Diplomacy might come into play. President Xi Jinping (習近平) has shown a willingness to side with his counterpart Vladimir Putin but that support is not endless nor absolute. If Moscow keeps pressuring foreign automakers to expand their local manufacturing footprint, Xi might need to push back. At the end of the day, Beijing is happy to have found a new market for its wares, but its leaders know it must put China’s economy first.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia. Previously, he was a technology reporter for Bloomberg News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the