KMT blind to Taiwan
On a journey from Vancouver to the Canadian Rocky Mountains, we passed through a village popular with tourists — Hope, British Columbia.
“Here, you can see the flags of the countries whose citizens visit this village the most,” our guide told us.
Among the array of flags flying high, two caught my eye: Taiwan’s and China’s, side by side yet hanging on separate poles.
The town clearly recognizes the Republic of China (ROC) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as two distinct countries, affirming the stance that “the ROC and PRC are not under the jurisdiction of each other.”
This principle was long upheld by former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and is now backed by President William Lai (賴清德). In his inaugural address on May 20, Lai reiterated that “China and Taiwan are not subordinate to each other,” a view that is shared by more than 70 percent of Taiwanese and transcends political parties.
Despite Lai’s factual assertion, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reflexively responded by calling the words “dangerous” and akin to a “two-state theory.”
How can Taiwan and China be considered the same country? Is the KMT planning on forcing independent Taiwan to mesh with authoritarian China?
Lai made no mistake in his speech, and it is the KMT that is disregarding Taiwanese public opinion.
Democratic countries across the world, including the European Parliament, have acknowledged that Taiwan and China are not under each other’s jurisdiction.
The international community refers to the hostile country that seeks to annex Taiwan as “China.” Yet, the KMT insists on making the absurd demand that the Legislative Yuan adopt the term “mainland.” Given that “China” is embedded in the KMT’s name, it is unsurprising that the Internet is abuzz with suggestions that it rename itself the “Mainland Nationalist Party.”
Differences in national identity are the main source of political tension in Taiwan. The KMT, having fled China and survived solely due to Taiwan’s acceptance, now bites the hand that fed it. While logic dictates that the KMT should have taken root in Taiwan, it is instead scheming to achieve its charter’s objective of unification with China.
The KMT and the Chinese Communist Party share striking similarities, and regard the Democratic Progressive Party as the enemy.
The China-leaning KMT is out of touch with the majority opinion in Taiwan and is at odds with global trends. Such strong rejection to the current trajectory will only lead to its decline.
Additionally, the appalling behavior displayed by KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) in the past few weeks — and the KMT’s subsequent failure to respond appropriately — only supports that idea.
The Legislative Yuan has been surrounded by protesters over the past couple of months, the majority of whom are young people and women. Such scenes serve as a wake-up call for the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party. However, should both parties continue to let their caucus whips run amok, their support is sure to dwindle even further.
Chiu Ping-chin
Taipei
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS