A program to provide NT$30 billion (US$926.33 million) in annual rent subsidies for low and middle-income households, which is estimated to benefit 500,000 households, is to continue next year, a government official said last week. While it is good that President William Lai (賴清德) continues to focus on the housing needs of low-income households, for that assistance to be effective the government needs to revise the rules for accessing social housing or subsidy programs.
In a Taipei Times article published last year (“Social housing and next year’s election,” July 17 last year, page 13), columnist Michael Turton wrote that many Taiwanese cannot obtain social housing benefits as they do not “fall below the 50th percentile of income in their area.” Due to a shortage of social housing units, applicants must also try their luck in a lottery system, he wrote.
This is the same dilemma faced by low-to-medium-income families seeking to access the scarce slots available in public daycare and kindergarten services.
Taipei Department of Social Welfare data showed that 39,665 people from 20,518 households — who account for 1.58 percent of the city’s population — are considered low-income. During the tenure of former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), he oversaw the completion of 20,000 social-housing units, although that was well below the 50,000 he initially proposed.
However, even those with average incomes struggle to rent a home large enough for a family in Taipei. Statistics Web site Numbeo says that the average monthly rent for a three-bedroom apartment in the city is more than NT$50,000. The Central News Agency reported on Nov. 29 last year that the average salary for an office worker in Taipei was NT$694,000, which works out to NT$57,833 per month.
Those who opt to purchase a house would not be any better off, assuming that the average new apartment in Taipei costs NT$50 million, with a 30-year mortgage at a 3 percent interest rate.
Exceptionally high housing costs, coupled with disproportionately low wages, are the reason most young couples in Taiwan opt not to have children, leading to a rapidly falling birthrate that several officials have termed a national security crisis.
If Lai wants to get serious about addressing the low birthrate, he must aggressively tackle the housing crisis. He must set loftier goals than Ko did, and make affordable housing available at a lower threshold. The government cannot mandate that companies raise wages, but it could offer tax incentives for those that do. It can also increase the availability of social housing and public daycare.
Most young workers in Taiwan make nowhere near that average monthly income of NT$57,833, and for those making below the average, rental units large enough for a family are even further out of reach. Nine percent of respondents in a survey by non-governmental organization the Taiwan Social Welfare League said they believe they live in poverty, while 7.8 percent said they believe they live in near-poverty, Taiwan News reported on Sept. 25 last year.
Further exacerbating the problem is many of the extant residential buildings in Taipei and elsewhere in the country were built “during the housing boom of the 50s and 60s [and] are reaching the end of their lives,” Turton wrote. “These units are often without elevators and inhabited by the elderly.”
The buildings do not have elevators, because they are not required to, as they have five or fewer floors. To replace these aging buildings — many of which are susceptible to toppling in a major earthquake — the government could construct buildings with a mix of apartments and low-cost social-housing units.
Lai is smart to take on housing, but he must not hold back in tackling the issue. Anything less than a major overhaul of social housing would be too little, too late.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,