A program to provide NT$30 billion (US$926.33 million) in annual rent subsidies for low and middle-income households, which is estimated to benefit 500,000 households, is to continue next year, a government official said last week. While it is good that President William Lai (賴清德) continues to focus on the housing needs of low-income households, for that assistance to be effective the government needs to revise the rules for accessing social housing or subsidy programs.
In a Taipei Times article published last year (“Social housing and next year’s election,” July 17 last year, page 13), columnist Michael Turton wrote that many Taiwanese cannot obtain social housing benefits as they do not “fall below the 50th percentile of income in their area.” Due to a shortage of social housing units, applicants must also try their luck in a lottery system, he wrote.
This is the same dilemma faced by low-to-medium-income families seeking to access the scarce slots available in public daycare and kindergarten services.
Taipei Department of Social Welfare data showed that 39,665 people from 20,518 households — who account for 1.58 percent of the city’s population — are considered low-income. During the tenure of former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), he oversaw the completion of 20,000 social-housing units, although that was well below the 50,000 he initially proposed.
However, even those with average incomes struggle to rent a home large enough for a family in Taipei. Statistics Web site Numbeo says that the average monthly rent for a three-bedroom apartment in the city is more than NT$50,000. The Central News Agency reported on Nov. 29 last year that the average salary for an office worker in Taipei was NT$694,000, which works out to NT$57,833 per month.
Those who opt to purchase a house would not be any better off, assuming that the average new apartment in Taipei costs NT$50 million, with a 30-year mortgage at a 3 percent interest rate.
Exceptionally high housing costs, coupled with disproportionately low wages, are the reason most young couples in Taiwan opt not to have children, leading to a rapidly falling birthrate that several officials have termed a national security crisis.
If Lai wants to get serious about addressing the low birthrate, he must aggressively tackle the housing crisis. He must set loftier goals than Ko did, and make affordable housing available at a lower threshold. The government cannot mandate that companies raise wages, but it could offer tax incentives for those that do. It can also increase the availability of social housing and public daycare.
Most young workers in Taiwan make nowhere near that average monthly income of NT$57,833, and for those making below the average, rental units large enough for a family are even further out of reach. Nine percent of respondents in a survey by non-governmental organization the Taiwan Social Welfare League said they believe they live in poverty, while 7.8 percent said they believe they live in near-poverty, Taiwan News reported on Sept. 25 last year.
Further exacerbating the problem is many of the extant residential buildings in Taipei and elsewhere in the country were built “during the housing boom of the 50s and 60s [and] are reaching the end of their lives,” Turton wrote. “These units are often without elevators and inhabited by the elderly.”
The buildings do not have elevators, because they are not required to, as they have five or fewer floors. To replace these aging buildings — many of which are susceptible to toppling in a major earthquake — the government could construct buildings with a mix of apartments and low-cost social-housing units.
Lai is smart to take on housing, but he must not hold back in tackling the issue. Anything less than a major overhaul of social housing would be too little, too late.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS