Although his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) did not roll to the landslide victory he hoped for, Narendra Modi has secured a rare third five-year term as India’s prime minister.
It was not an easy win.
High inflation and unemployment helped a more unified opposition portray Modi as too cozy with big business, reducing his BJP-led alliance’s margin of victory. Growing wealth inequality forced Modi to lean more heavily on the appeal of an often-ugly Hindu nationalism, a burden he has allowed subordinates to carry in the past.
Illustration: Mountain People
In addition, India’s media environment has become more polarized, with many more people getting their news online than when Modi was first elected a decade ago.
However, Modi himself remains far more popular than his party. He has built a reputation for personal integrity and after a decade in office, his name recognition is uncontestable.
That matters in a country with dozens of different languages spoken by millions of people.
Once the votes were counted in the world’s largest and longest-running election, Modi emerged again as the man of the moment.
India needs a popular leader because the long-term challenges it faces are formidable. Within 10 years, India will confront serious water shortages and there is no obvious fix. Modi must work with weak local governments, many of which depend for political support on farming interests that rely too heavily on water-intensive agriculture in areas where water is already in short supply.
Then there is climate change. India has already set temperature records this summer, and hundreds of millions of Indians have no way to escape the heat and humidity.
Add some of the world’s worst air quality, a problem that will become much worse given the enormous amount of power — much of it generated in coal-fired plants — needed to sustain the country’s expected robust economic growth.
The result will be an increase in human suffering in a country with more than its share of environmental damage.
There is also a major structural problem with India’s economy: Not many women contribute to it. Fewer than one-third of employable women are now in the workforce. There are very few female CEOs or corporate board members and a tiny fraction of the country’s venture-capital funding goes to start-ups founded or led by women.
The World Economic Forum’s most recent Global Gender Gap Report ranked India 127th out of 146 countries, behind its neighbors Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. To solve this problem, Modi and other local officials must contend with a large rural population, crippling poverty and conservative social values.
Many tout India’s strong demographics as a crucial economic advantage, particularly when compared with China, Japan and some of Europe’s largest economies, but when half the population face the obstacles to joining the formal economy that India’s women do, the advantage is far from being realized.
Finally, India has 1.5 billion people and too many still live in poverty. Last year, India ranked 111th out of 125 countries on the Global Hunger Index. While China has become an upper-middle-income country, India’s path toward that status is far from secure.
Given its many structural challenges, India could fail to develop as Modi promises, leaving the country more vulnerable to social and political instability, fueled in part by the Hindu nationalism that Modi himself has amplified.
At the same time, India’s geopolitical position confers many advantages. Modi’s government will continue to benefit from the trend that many Indians call “China +1” — the popularity in many Western and Asian countries of limiting production and supply-chain risks associated with China by shifting business operations and investment toward its neighbor. Many multinational corporations across a variety of key economic sectors now see India not only as a viable alternative for long-term capital investment, but as an attractive market in its own right.
Although India’s domestic infrastructure investment continues to lag behind China, the gap is narrowing. In Mumbai, major new highways, bridges and tunnels are easing some of the world’s worst urban traffic. There are fewer interruptions of electricity, communications and the Internet. India is not China, but its day-to-day business operations are no longer regularly disrupted.
India has also made gains in higher-end manufacturing and now exports more motorcycles, cars and other goods that meet once-unimaginable quality standards.
India’s biggest foreign-policy challenges are on its borders with China, Pakistan and Myanmar. All three countries create security problems.
However, outside India’s neighborhood, Modi sees important opportunities.
That is true not only in relations with the US — India is one of the few countries that can expect increasingly close ties with Washington no matter who wins the November presidential election in the US — but especially in the Global South, where Modi has earned a leadership role.
As was seen last year when India hosted the G20 summit, Modi wants India to become a vitally important bridge between the developed and developing worlds.
Since the Cold War’s end, no country’s rise has been welcomed by so many other governments.
In short, India still faces enormous long-term challenges, but Modi’s personal appeal at home and the inroads he has helped establish for India abroad will make his country’s development one of the most important stories of the next decade.
Ian Bremmer, founder and president of Eurasia Group and GZERO Media, is a member of the Executive Committee of the UN High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS