The pro-China camp in Taiwan is apparently displeased with Nvidia Corp founder and CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), and an Internet celebrity even searched for and disclosed his personal information online. Such disapproval was not only due to Huang using the word “country” to describe Taiwan or his praise for the nation’s technology industry, but also because his very existence implies support for Taiwan.
After reforms in the Tang (唐) and Song (宋) dynasties, the class system of the “four occupations” — academic, farmer, worker and businessperson — took shape in China.
Prior to the changes, businesspeople held influential roles in China. The powerful merchant Mi Zhu (麋竺) sponsored Liu Bei (劉備) — a warlord in the Han Dynasty (漢) and the founder of the Han kingdom of Shu (蜀漢). As a result, Mi was treated with great courtesy by Liu.
A CULTURAL DIVIDE
As times changed, businesspeople fell to the bottom of the pile of the four classes, and engaging in business was at most a “means,” rather than a “goal.” After businesspeople made some money, many of them might enter politics through imperial examination or public donation, turning from merchants to officials.
Taiwan is different.
An old Taiwanese saying goes that “the best job is to sell ice and the second best is to become a doctor,” with “selling ice” referring to doing business.
“Good academics are easy to find; good businesspeople are hard to find,” another old Taiwanese saying goes.
The proverbs show that Taiwan’s occupational hierarchy historically contrasts with China’s academic, farmer, worker and businessperson framework.
ISLAND OF TRADE
Since ancient times, Taiwan has been an island of trade beyond the reach of the Confucian regimes.
Huang’s visit to Taiwan as an international entrepreneur has drawn a great deal of media attention. The question of why Huang did not turn away from a life as a businessman to become a politician demonstrates the different cultures and histories between Taiwan and China.
Taiwanese society’s embrace of Huang is in stark contrast to China’s use of “common prosperity” to deal with Alibaba Group founder Jack Ma (馬雲). It is no wonder that the pro-unification and pro-China camps in Taiwan are annoyed by Huang’s visit.
SPORTS AND BUSINESS
More than a decade ago, retired Taiwanese diplomat Kuo Kuan-ying (郭冠英) voiced his disfavor of baseball as it was brought to the country during the Japanese colonial era, but said he preferred table tennis, which is popular in China and has become symbolic of its diplomacy with the US.
Different phenomena occur naturally in business and sports, and they have nothing to do with insulting China or supporting Taiwanese independence, but instead come about as a result of the different historical contexts that exist on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
It is a pity that some people are uncomfortable simply because of the different phenomena. However, Taiwan cannot engage in communal wealth or a cultural revolution for the sake of making those people feel comfortable. The government, the public and businesses would not agree to it, and even the pro-China members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party dare not agree to it.
Jimway Chang is a high-school history teacher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS