The pro-China camp in Taiwan is apparently displeased with Nvidia Corp founder and CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), and an Internet celebrity even searched for and disclosed his personal information online. Such disapproval was not only due to Huang using the word “country” to describe Taiwan or his praise for the nation’s technology industry, but also because his very existence implies support for Taiwan.
After reforms in the Tang (唐) and Song (宋) dynasties, the class system of the “four occupations” — academic, farmer, worker and businessperson — took shape in China.
Prior to the changes, businesspeople held influential roles in China. The powerful merchant Mi Zhu (麋竺) sponsored Liu Bei (劉備) — a warlord in the Han Dynasty (漢) and the founder of the Han kingdom of Shu (蜀漢). As a result, Mi was treated with great courtesy by Liu.
A CULTURAL DIVIDE
As times changed, businesspeople fell to the bottom of the pile of the four classes, and engaging in business was at most a “means,” rather than a “goal.” After businesspeople made some money, many of them might enter politics through imperial examination or public donation, turning from merchants to officials.
Taiwan is different.
An old Taiwanese saying goes that “the best job is to sell ice and the second best is to become a doctor,” with “selling ice” referring to doing business.
“Good academics are easy to find; good businesspeople are hard to find,” another old Taiwanese saying goes.
The proverbs show that Taiwan’s occupational hierarchy historically contrasts with China’s academic, farmer, worker and businessperson framework.
ISLAND OF TRADE
Since ancient times, Taiwan has been an island of trade beyond the reach of the Confucian regimes.
Huang’s visit to Taiwan as an international entrepreneur has drawn a great deal of media attention. The question of why Huang did not turn away from a life as a businessman to become a politician demonstrates the different cultures and histories between Taiwan and China.
Taiwanese society’s embrace of Huang is in stark contrast to China’s use of “common prosperity” to deal with Alibaba Group founder Jack Ma (馬雲). It is no wonder that the pro-unification and pro-China camps in Taiwan are annoyed by Huang’s visit.
SPORTS AND BUSINESS
More than a decade ago, retired Taiwanese diplomat Kuo Kuan-ying (郭冠英) voiced his disfavor of baseball as it was brought to the country during the Japanese colonial era, but said he preferred table tennis, which is popular in China and has become symbolic of its diplomacy with the US.
Different phenomena occur naturally in business and sports, and they have nothing to do with insulting China or supporting Taiwanese independence, but instead come about as a result of the different historical contexts that exist on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
It is a pity that some people are uncomfortable simply because of the different phenomena. However, Taiwan cannot engage in communal wealth or a cultural revolution for the sake of making those people feel comfortable. The government, the public and businesses would not agree to it, and even the pro-China members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party dare not agree to it.
Jimway Chang is a high-school history teacher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS