The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been markedly escalating its military infiltration activities aimed at Taiwan.
Retired air force lieutenant colonel Tu Yung-hsin (杜永心), who went to China to start a business, was recruited by a member of China’s Central Military Commission to develop a spy network in Taiwan. Tu lured active military officers to join his network, with the understanding that in the event of a war in the Taiwan Strait, they would adopt a passive stance of non-resistance.
The Supreme Court sentenced Tu to four years in prison in accordance with the National Security Act (國家安全法). Consequently, military authorities determined that Tu had lost the right to receive any further military pension payments and told him to repay what he had already received over the previous 12 years.
Apart from using financial means to lure Taiwanese businesspeople and companies, and infiltrating Taiwan’s political organizations and the media, the CCP’s infiltration of Taiwan’s military is getting more serious. In its attempts to bribe serving military personnel, the CCP often targets senior officers with the aim of disintegrating Taiwan’s armed forces from within.
The military “united front”-style infiltration is intended to diminish the power of Taiwan’s national defense, paving the way for unification by force of arms.
The Tu spying case highlights the methods that the CCP uses to infiltrate Taiwan.
As well as trying to bribe high-ranking officers in Taiwan’s armed forces, it also tries to brainwash them into being loyal to the CCP. Far from being an isolated case, it is part of the CCP’s psychological warfare strategy.
The methods are covert and insidious. As well as bribery, the strategy makes clever use of psychological warfare methods to manipulate people in Taiwan and disintegrate the national defense system from the inside.
A US think tank warned that the CCP might, before Taiwan’s next presidential election in 2028, adopt a four-stage strategy of “subjugation without fighting” that would involve gradually infiltrating and controlling Taiwan.
This includes increasing Taiwan’s economic dependence on China, infiltrating the political arena and media to influence the election, and exercising more direct control.
This step-by-step means of controlling Taiwan is meant to avoid triggering an armed conflict, but the ultimate goal is still to seize Taiwan.
Faced with such pervasive recruitment and threats from the CCP, Taiwan must be more vigilant. It must bolster its national defense, especially its military power, as well as its intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities, to identify and obstruct the CCP’s activities.
At the same time, it must build popular consensus, raise the public’s vigilance and improve people’s ability to resist temptation, in order to prevent the CCP’s “united front” strategy from succeeding.
Only through a comprehensive response can Taiwan ensure its security and sovereignty.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS