The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been markedly escalating its military infiltration activities aimed at Taiwan.
Retired air force lieutenant colonel Tu Yung-hsin (杜永心), who went to China to start a business, was recruited by a member of China’s Central Military Commission to develop a spy network in Taiwan. Tu lured active military officers to join his network, with the understanding that in the event of a war in the Taiwan Strait, they would adopt a passive stance of non-resistance.
The Supreme Court sentenced Tu to four years in prison in accordance with the National Security Act (國家安全法). Consequently, military authorities determined that Tu had lost the right to receive any further military pension payments and told him to repay what he had already received over the previous 12 years.
Apart from using financial means to lure Taiwanese businesspeople and companies, and infiltrating Taiwan’s political organizations and the media, the CCP’s infiltration of Taiwan’s military is getting more serious. In its attempts to bribe serving military personnel, the CCP often targets senior officers with the aim of disintegrating Taiwan’s armed forces from within.
The military “united front”-style infiltration is intended to diminish the power of Taiwan’s national defense, paving the way for unification by force of arms.
The Tu spying case highlights the methods that the CCP uses to infiltrate Taiwan.
As well as trying to bribe high-ranking officers in Taiwan’s armed forces, it also tries to brainwash them into being loyal to the CCP. Far from being an isolated case, it is part of the CCP’s psychological warfare strategy.
The methods are covert and insidious. As well as bribery, the strategy makes clever use of psychological warfare methods to manipulate people in Taiwan and disintegrate the national defense system from the inside.
A US think tank warned that the CCP might, before Taiwan’s next presidential election in 2028, adopt a four-stage strategy of “subjugation without fighting” that would involve gradually infiltrating and controlling Taiwan.
This includes increasing Taiwan’s economic dependence on China, infiltrating the political arena and media to influence the election, and exercising more direct control.
This step-by-step means of controlling Taiwan is meant to avoid triggering an armed conflict, but the ultimate goal is still to seize Taiwan.
Faced with such pervasive recruitment and threats from the CCP, Taiwan must be more vigilant. It must bolster its national defense, especially its military power, as well as its intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities, to identify and obstruct the CCP’s activities.
At the same time, it must build popular consensus, raise the public’s vigilance and improve people’s ability to resist temptation, in order to prevent the CCP’s “united front” strategy from succeeding.
Only through a comprehensive response can Taiwan ensure its security and sovereignty.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS