Taiwan could become an “artificial intelligence (AI) island” under the current administration, President William Lai (賴清德) said on Tuesday.
Speaking at the annual Computex Taipei exhibition, Lai said that his government would ensure a reliable power supply, build supercomputers and cultivate talent in information and communications technology to bolster developments in AI.
Lai’s push for AI development is in line with global trends, and would complement Taiwan’s strengths in the semiconductor industry. Taiwanese tech industry heavyweights also have the advantage of close cooperation with AI frontrunner Nvidia Corp, whose CEO, Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), spoke on this at Computex. Huang also donated a supercomputer to Taiwan that could help researchers accelerate the development of AI systems. While Taiwan’s own Taiwania 3 supercomputer is capable of 2.7 petaFLOPS (2.7 quadrillion floating point operations per second), Nvidia’s Taipei-1 supercomputer operates at a significantly faster 1 exaFLOPS.
Of course, AI advancements would drive Taiwan’s economy, but there are also defense implications. It is predicted that AI would feature more prominently on the battlefield in the future, as it would allow a decentralized command structure and would enable autonomous drone strikes and reconnaissance missions. Taiwan could work with countries like the US and Japan to develop AI systems for defense use, creating a regional bulwark against Chinese aggression.
There are also the implications of China’s reliance on Taiwanese chips, which has resulted in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) being hailed as one of the “sacred mountains” that protect Taiwan from attack.
The importance of Taiwan’s chips to the global economy has been raised in the US, the EU, Japan and elsewhere, and is part of the reason Taiwan has received so much global support and attention in recent years.
This fact is not lost on Lai, who said at Computex that Taiwan was fortunate to “have a technology industry in which leaders spent decades working and catapulting it into the center of the AI revolution, turning it from nothing into the supporting pillars of the world.”
Lai is not exaggerating. Taiwan has long been making chips for AMD, Intel, Nvidia and Qualcomm, all of whom are big players in the field of AI.
Lai said his administration would seek to cultivate talent in information technology, and it would truly be in the government’s interest to do so. The government could facilitate this by investing in incubators and specialized programs at the top universities, and hiring researchers and professors from overseas to fill any talent gaps.
TSMC earlier this week announced it would donate NT$4 billion (US$124 million) to senior-high schools and universities to cultivate talent.
Other industry heavyweights might also be interested in public-private partnerships, which could allow more private funds to be funneled into public institutions for the purpose.
AI would be of growing importance in the years to come, and while Taiwan is already well-positioned as a leader in the hardware that powers the industry, it has ground to make up on the software side of things. If Lai lives up to his promise, Taiwan could make strides.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS