Taiwan could become an “artificial intelligence (AI) island” under the current administration, President William Lai (賴清德) said on Tuesday.
Speaking at the annual Computex Taipei exhibition, Lai said that his government would ensure a reliable power supply, build supercomputers and cultivate talent in information and communications technology to bolster developments in AI.
Lai’s push for AI development is in line with global trends, and would complement Taiwan’s strengths in the semiconductor industry. Taiwanese tech industry heavyweights also have the advantage of close cooperation with AI frontrunner Nvidia Corp, whose CEO, Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), spoke on this at Computex. Huang also donated a supercomputer to Taiwan that could help researchers accelerate the development of AI systems. While Taiwan’s own Taiwania 3 supercomputer is capable of 2.7 petaFLOPS (2.7 quadrillion floating point operations per second), Nvidia’s Taipei-1 supercomputer operates at a significantly faster 1 exaFLOPS.
Of course, AI advancements would drive Taiwan’s economy, but there are also defense implications. It is predicted that AI would feature more prominently on the battlefield in the future, as it would allow a decentralized command structure and would enable autonomous drone strikes and reconnaissance missions. Taiwan could work with countries like the US and Japan to develop AI systems for defense use, creating a regional bulwark against Chinese aggression.
There are also the implications of China’s reliance on Taiwanese chips, which has resulted in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) being hailed as one of the “sacred mountains” that protect Taiwan from attack.
The importance of Taiwan’s chips to the global economy has been raised in the US, the EU, Japan and elsewhere, and is part of the reason Taiwan has received so much global support and attention in recent years.
This fact is not lost on Lai, who said at Computex that Taiwan was fortunate to “have a technology industry in which leaders spent decades working and catapulting it into the center of the AI revolution, turning it from nothing into the supporting pillars of the world.”
Lai is not exaggerating. Taiwan has long been making chips for AMD, Intel, Nvidia and Qualcomm, all of whom are big players in the field of AI.
Lai said his administration would seek to cultivate talent in information technology, and it would truly be in the government’s interest to do so. The government could facilitate this by investing in incubators and specialized programs at the top universities, and hiring researchers and professors from overseas to fill any talent gaps.
TSMC earlier this week announced it would donate NT$4 billion (US$124 million) to senior-high schools and universities to cultivate talent.
Other industry heavyweights might also be interested in public-private partnerships, which could allow more private funds to be funneled into public institutions for the purpose.
AI would be of growing importance in the years to come, and while Taiwan is already well-positioned as a leader in the hardware that powers the industry, it has ground to make up on the software side of things. If Lai lives up to his promise, Taiwan could make strides.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS