Lately, I have been seeing headlines like this one from the long-running tech news site CNET: “Will Siri Become More Like ChatGPT?”
If you are an iPhone user, I bet your instinctive answer to that question is: “I sure hope not.” Or maybe: “I don’t care — I don’t use Siri anyway.”
Both are reasonable reactions. The iPhone is too important to our day-to-day lives to be bogged down with experimental artificial intelligence (AI) that is just as likely to hallucinate as it is to help.
Regardless, the question is being asked because next week is Apple’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC), the forum in which CEO Tim Cook is widely expected to detail his company’s most significant moves in AI to date.
This would not be saying much. The company is seen as being drastically behind its peers, so much so that, if reports are correct, getting Apple up to speed would require some kind of partnership with OpenAI, or perhaps Google, to get cutting-edge functionality on to the iPhone in some shape or form.
The desire to do all this comes less from users and more from Wall Street. With Apple’s share price flagging so far this year compared with those of its tech rivals, investors hope Apple might flip the narrative by offering a grand vision of AI it has kept hidden (or did not have) until now. There’s an “AI driven iPhone 16 supercycle now on the horizon,” according to analysts at Wedbush Securities, calling WWDC the most important Apple event in a decade.
Now, Wedbush is one of the more excitable tech watchers on Wall Street. Still, the level of broad expectation is palpable. Investors hope AI might give consumers a reason to upgrade their smartphones sooner than they might have otherwise — an antidote to faltering iPhone sales.
Front of mind, as that CNET headline suggested, is the hapless Siri. The voice assistant, which has long been a great idea in need of better execution, is set for an “overhaul,” according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, “a move that will let users control individual app functions with their voice.”
Will a smarter Siri send people rushing out to buy a new iPhone? I would not count on it. According to a recent poll by Bloomberg Intelligence, just 7 percent of 568 US-based respondents said AI features were a factor in deciding their next device. The age-old headaches like battery life (45 percent) and price (40 percent) are still paramount. The same survey indicated that consumers are holding on to their phones for longer than ever thanks to “inflation and high product quality.”
On the plus side for Apple, when existing iPhone owners decide to upgrade, they overwhelmingly stay with the company — 94 percent, according to the poll.
This all means “there’s no rush” for Apple to bring AI features to its users, said Carolina Milanesi, a tech analyst from Creative Strategies.
In fact, it could do more harm than good. A company built on “it just works” and promises around privacy could find that current AI applications run counter to both of those hard-earned pillars of their reputation. AI is often buggy, sluggish and, for the more sophisticated queries, requires sending data away for heavy lifting in the cloud.
“Apple may have found that they’re behind the market,” CCS Insight analyst Ben Wood said. “But they don’t need to have a knee-jerk reaction.”
A knee-jerk reaction would risk looking a lot like Meta Platforms Inc’s AI bot, crammed clumsily into apps like WhatsApp and Messenger and described by many as irritating. Or it could end up like Google’s AI Overviews, rolled back just a week after producing what Google described as “odd and erroneous” results to search queries.
The launch of these products was motivated at least in part by the need to keep Wall Street happy, helping to justify copious levels of spending on new infrastructure. Google employees I have spoken to mention a culture of near panic as the company worries its search dominance is threatened by AI.
Cooler heads must prevail at Apple, where such threats are not a concern — at least not on any near-term horizon. The iPhone is the competitive moat to end all moats, the Hotel California of tech products, joked Wood — antitrust regulators find it less funny. Users would not hurry to abandon years of loyalty to jump ship for AI. What is being offered so far by the likes of Google and Samsung is just not transformative enough to warrant the effort.
So, Apple has the luxury of time, and it need not fall into the trap of rolling out half-baked ideas to protect its position. Instead, its priority should be careful and incremental AI updates to enhance existing features and use cases. There is no doubt the potential for AI on Apple products is immense. With a delicate touch, Apple can become the most important AI company in the world, bringing the innovation to the masses just as it did with the smartphone. Investors should not rush the company just to get a quick victory.
Dave Lee is Bloomberg Opinion’s US technology columnist. He was previously a correspondent for the Financial Times and BBC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS