Lately, I have been seeing headlines like this one from the long-running tech news site CNET: “Will Siri Become More Like ChatGPT?”
If you are an iPhone user, I bet your instinctive answer to that question is: “I sure hope not.” Or maybe: “I don’t care — I don’t use Siri anyway.”
Both are reasonable reactions. The iPhone is too important to our day-to-day lives to be bogged down with experimental artificial intelligence (AI) that is just as likely to hallucinate as it is to help.
Regardless, the question is being asked because next week is Apple’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC), the forum in which CEO Tim Cook is widely expected to detail his company’s most significant moves in AI to date.
This would not be saying much. The company is seen as being drastically behind its peers, so much so that, if reports are correct, getting Apple up to speed would require some kind of partnership with OpenAI, or perhaps Google, to get cutting-edge functionality on to the iPhone in some shape or form.
The desire to do all this comes less from users and more from Wall Street. With Apple’s share price flagging so far this year compared with those of its tech rivals, investors hope Apple might flip the narrative by offering a grand vision of AI it has kept hidden (or did not have) until now. There’s an “AI driven iPhone 16 supercycle now on the horizon,” according to analysts at Wedbush Securities, calling WWDC the most important Apple event in a decade.
Now, Wedbush is one of the more excitable tech watchers on Wall Street. Still, the level of broad expectation is palpable. Investors hope AI might give consumers a reason to upgrade their smartphones sooner than they might have otherwise — an antidote to faltering iPhone sales.
Front of mind, as that CNET headline suggested, is the hapless Siri. The voice assistant, which has long been a great idea in need of better execution, is set for an “overhaul,” according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, “a move that will let users control individual app functions with their voice.”
Will a smarter Siri send people rushing out to buy a new iPhone? I would not count on it. According to a recent poll by Bloomberg Intelligence, just 7 percent of 568 US-based respondents said AI features were a factor in deciding their next device. The age-old headaches like battery life (45 percent) and price (40 percent) are still paramount. The same survey indicated that consumers are holding on to their phones for longer than ever thanks to “inflation and high product quality.”
On the plus side for Apple, when existing iPhone owners decide to upgrade, they overwhelmingly stay with the company — 94 percent, according to the poll.
This all means “there’s no rush” for Apple to bring AI features to its users, said Carolina Milanesi, a tech analyst from Creative Strategies.
In fact, it could do more harm than good. A company built on “it just works” and promises around privacy could find that current AI applications run counter to both of those hard-earned pillars of their reputation. AI is often buggy, sluggish and, for the more sophisticated queries, requires sending data away for heavy lifting in the cloud.
“Apple may have found that they’re behind the market,” CCS Insight analyst Ben Wood said. “But they don’t need to have a knee-jerk reaction.”
A knee-jerk reaction would risk looking a lot like Meta Platforms Inc’s AI bot, crammed clumsily into apps like WhatsApp and Messenger and described by many as irritating. Or it could end up like Google’s AI Overviews, rolled back just a week after producing what Google described as “odd and erroneous” results to search queries.
The launch of these products was motivated at least in part by the need to keep Wall Street happy, helping to justify copious levels of spending on new infrastructure. Google employees I have spoken to mention a culture of near panic as the company worries its search dominance is threatened by AI.
Cooler heads must prevail at Apple, where such threats are not a concern — at least not on any near-term horizon. The iPhone is the competitive moat to end all moats, the Hotel California of tech products, joked Wood — antitrust regulators find it less funny. Users would not hurry to abandon years of loyalty to jump ship for AI. What is being offered so far by the likes of Google and Samsung is just not transformative enough to warrant the effort.
So, Apple has the luxury of time, and it need not fall into the trap of rolling out half-baked ideas to protect its position. Instead, its priority should be careful and incremental AI updates to enhance existing features and use cases. There is no doubt the potential for AI on Apple products is immense. With a delicate touch, Apple can become the most important AI company in the world, bringing the innovation to the masses just as it did with the smartphone. Investors should not rush the company just to get a quick victory.
Dave Lee is Bloomberg Opinion’s US technology columnist. He was previously a correspondent for the Financial Times and BBC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS