The largest election in the world in India covering an electorate of 968 million people from April 19 to Saturday has been completed. The results were unexpected, with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) majority diminished.
The BJP had 303 seats previously and had won handsomely in 2014 and 2019 under the leadership of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This year, it belied expectations and pollsters’ predictions. Its 240 seats were below the majority mark of 272, although it remains by far the single largest party and with its National Democratic Alliance it won 295 seats, giving it a safe majority.
The opposition Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance could only cobble together 235 seats.
The BJPs losses came in the bigger states. While it enhanced its performance in eastern and southern India, in the five states with the largest representations in parliament — Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu — it made no new gains or lost seats, which pushed it down to its lowest level since 2014.
Yet Modi returns to lead a government for the third time, equaling the record of India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. Modi’s government has promised continuity and emphasis on its detailed manifesto, including rapid economic growth, employment generation and welfare.
Foreign policy was not a major polling agenda, but national security is. The BJP is committed to a robust development of India’s physical and economic security. Its work in the area will be watched carefully.
As India grows to be the third-largest world economy, it needs a large dose of technology and employment generation to augment its successes in digital technology and IT services. India seeks trade, technology and tourism engagement with countries and tasks its diplomats to enhance exports, seek modern technologies and enlarge tourism inflows.
Countries where this could happen will be brought into renewed focus. Renewable energy, semiconductors, critical minerals and manufacturing foreign direct investment will be top objectives.
The relationship with the US will remain a prime focus strategically in the Indo-Pacific region and for technology and economic aspects. A further expansion of engagement with the EU, perhaps leading to the conclusion of a long pending India-EU free-trade agreement will be pursued. A greater strategic coherence with Europe and expansion of technology relations through the Trade and Technology Council transatlantic forum are important issues.
India will continue its engagement with the G7. It will remain engaged with BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. The Indo-Pacific region will remain a major area of focus for New Delhi as it implements its Act East Policy and Indo-Pacific Oceans’ Initiative. The relationships with Japan and others in the Indo-Pacific region are strategically important for expanded economic engagement.
The biggest challenges will be dealing with Pakistan and China, both of which have clear hostility toward the rise of India. Pakistan’s new civilian government makes positive noises about engaging India. This will depend on how Pakistan controls cross-border terrorism. The higher participation of the electorate in Jammu & Kashmir was encouraging.
China remains the biggest challenge. China expects India to engage without resolving their border issues. China unilaterally alters interactions on the border and creates new fault lines that are challenged by India. So far, India has maintained that without tranquility on the border, the relationship cannot progress.
The new government will enhance its defense arrangements on the border with China to prevent a recurrence of situations like 2020. While upgrading its guard, a confident government might seek to engage China in bilateral talks that would include the border.
Chinese assessments see the results of the elections as weakening India, but they strengthen Indian democracy. China is unused to this.
If the long-term diplomatic estrangement continues, India’s resolve to de-risk its engagements with China would result in closer partnerships in the Indo-Pacific, particularly Japan, the US and Australia. A closer engagement with Taiwan and ASEAN, as well as challenging Chinese hegemonic designs in the Indian Ocean is probable.
The quick congratulatory message from President William Lai (賴清德) and the prompt response by Modi after India’s election results were announced shows that India-Taiwan ties are poised to grow.
Gurjit Singh is a former Indian ambassador to Germany, Indonesia and ASEAN, Ethiopia and the African Union.
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS