The largest election in the world in India covering an electorate of 968 million people from April 19 to Saturday has been completed. The results were unexpected, with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) majority diminished.
The BJP had 303 seats previously and had won handsomely in 2014 and 2019 under the leadership of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This year, it belied expectations and pollsters’ predictions. Its 240 seats were below the majority mark of 272, although it remains by far the single largest party and with its National Democratic Alliance it won 295 seats, giving it a safe majority.
The opposition Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance could only cobble together 235 seats.
The BJPs losses came in the bigger states. While it enhanced its performance in eastern and southern India, in the five states with the largest representations in parliament — Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu — it made no new gains or lost seats, which pushed it down to its lowest level since 2014.
Yet Modi returns to lead a government for the third time, equaling the record of India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. Modi’s government has promised continuity and emphasis on its detailed manifesto, including rapid economic growth, employment generation and welfare.
Foreign policy was not a major polling agenda, but national security is. The BJP is committed to a robust development of India’s physical and economic security. Its work in the area will be watched carefully.
As India grows to be the third-largest world economy, it needs a large dose of technology and employment generation to augment its successes in digital technology and IT services. India seeks trade, technology and tourism engagement with countries and tasks its diplomats to enhance exports, seek modern technologies and enlarge tourism inflows.
Countries where this could happen will be brought into renewed focus. Renewable energy, semiconductors, critical minerals and manufacturing foreign direct investment will be top objectives.
The relationship with the US will remain a prime focus strategically in the Indo-Pacific region and for technology and economic aspects. A further expansion of engagement with the EU, perhaps leading to the conclusion of a long pending India-EU free-trade agreement will be pursued. A greater strategic coherence with Europe and expansion of technology relations through the Trade and Technology Council transatlantic forum are important issues.
India will continue its engagement with the G7. It will remain engaged with BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. The Indo-Pacific region will remain a major area of focus for New Delhi as it implements its Act East Policy and Indo-Pacific Oceans’ Initiative. The relationships with Japan and others in the Indo-Pacific region are strategically important for expanded economic engagement.
The biggest challenges will be dealing with Pakistan and China, both of which have clear hostility toward the rise of India. Pakistan’s new civilian government makes positive noises about engaging India. This will depend on how Pakistan controls cross-border terrorism. The higher participation of the electorate in Jammu & Kashmir was encouraging.
China remains the biggest challenge. China expects India to engage without resolving their border issues. China unilaterally alters interactions on the border and creates new fault lines that are challenged by India. So far, India has maintained that without tranquility on the border, the relationship cannot progress.
The new government will enhance its defense arrangements on the border with China to prevent a recurrence of situations like 2020. While upgrading its guard, a confident government might seek to engage China in bilateral talks that would include the border.
Chinese assessments see the results of the elections as weakening India, but they strengthen Indian democracy. China is unused to this.
If the long-term diplomatic estrangement continues, India’s resolve to de-risk its engagements with China would result in closer partnerships in the Indo-Pacific, particularly Japan, the US and Australia. A closer engagement with Taiwan and ASEAN, as well as challenging Chinese hegemonic designs in the Indian Ocean is probable.
The quick congratulatory message from President William Lai (賴清德) and the prompt response by Modi after India’s election results were announced shows that India-Taiwan ties are poised to grow.
Gurjit Singh is a former Indian ambassador to Germany, Indonesia and ASEAN, Ethiopia and the African Union.
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS