The largest election in the world in India covering an electorate of 968 million people from April 19 to Saturday has been completed. The results were unexpected, with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) majority diminished.
The BJP had 303 seats previously and had won handsomely in 2014 and 2019 under the leadership of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This year, it belied expectations and pollsters’ predictions. Its 240 seats were below the majority mark of 272, although it remains by far the single largest party and with its National Democratic Alliance it won 295 seats, giving it a safe majority.
The opposition Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance could only cobble together 235 seats.
The BJPs losses came in the bigger states. While it enhanced its performance in eastern and southern India, in the five states with the largest representations in parliament — Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu — it made no new gains or lost seats, which pushed it down to its lowest level since 2014.
Yet Modi returns to lead a government for the third time, equaling the record of India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. Modi’s government has promised continuity and emphasis on its detailed manifesto, including rapid economic growth, employment generation and welfare.
Foreign policy was not a major polling agenda, but national security is. The BJP is committed to a robust development of India’s physical and economic security. Its work in the area will be watched carefully.
As India grows to be the third-largest world economy, it needs a large dose of technology and employment generation to augment its successes in digital technology and IT services. India seeks trade, technology and tourism engagement with countries and tasks its diplomats to enhance exports, seek modern technologies and enlarge tourism inflows.
Countries where this could happen will be brought into renewed focus. Renewable energy, semiconductors, critical minerals and manufacturing foreign direct investment will be top objectives.
The relationship with the US will remain a prime focus strategically in the Indo-Pacific region and for technology and economic aspects. A further expansion of engagement with the EU, perhaps leading to the conclusion of a long pending India-EU free-trade agreement will be pursued. A greater strategic coherence with Europe and expansion of technology relations through the Trade and Technology Council transatlantic forum are important issues.
India will continue its engagement with the G7. It will remain engaged with BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. The Indo-Pacific region will remain a major area of focus for New Delhi as it implements its Act East Policy and Indo-Pacific Oceans’ Initiative. The relationships with Japan and others in the Indo-Pacific region are strategically important for expanded economic engagement.
The biggest challenges will be dealing with Pakistan and China, both of which have clear hostility toward the rise of India. Pakistan’s new civilian government makes positive noises about engaging India. This will depend on how Pakistan controls cross-border terrorism. The higher participation of the electorate in Jammu & Kashmir was encouraging.
China remains the biggest challenge. China expects India to engage without resolving their border issues. China unilaterally alters interactions on the border and creates new fault lines that are challenged by India. So far, India has maintained that without tranquility on the border, the relationship cannot progress.
The new government will enhance its defense arrangements on the border with China to prevent a recurrence of situations like 2020. While upgrading its guard, a confident government might seek to engage China in bilateral talks that would include the border.
Chinese assessments see the results of the elections as weakening India, but they strengthen Indian democracy. China is unused to this.
If the long-term diplomatic estrangement continues, India’s resolve to de-risk its engagements with China would result in closer partnerships in the Indo-Pacific, particularly Japan, the US and Australia. A closer engagement with Taiwan and ASEAN, as well as challenging Chinese hegemonic designs in the Indian Ocean is probable.
The quick congratulatory message from President William Lai (賴清德) and the prompt response by Modi after India’s election results were announced shows that India-Taiwan ties are poised to grow.
Gurjit Singh is a former Indian ambassador to Germany, Indonesia and ASEAN, Ethiopia and the African Union.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS