After seven long electoral phases that took place across India, the mother of elections in the world’s largest democracy ended on Sunday, with the results being declared on Tuesday. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, led by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and its coalition partners, the National Democratic Alliance, secured 292 seats, whereas the Indian National Congress and its multi-party Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance secured 234. The result was a reality check for the ruling party.
Several steps taken by the Modi government since 2014 have strengthened relations between India and Taiwan, although the former’s “one China” policy and the geopolitical situation do not allow it to recognize Taiwan as a country.
Though limited in political engagement, in the decade since 2014, when Modi became prime minister, and Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy was implemented by then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in 2016, nonpolitical ties between the two sides have increased significantly.
In Taiwan, multiple Indian events marking major festivals such as Diwali and Holi are also held, which then-minister of foreign affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) attended at India’s de facto embassy, the India Taipei Association.
Since 2020, there has been growing acceptance of Taiwan among Indian policymakers. In August 2022, when China launched military exercises around Taiwan, Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Arindam Bagchi expressed concerns about the unilateral attempt to change the “status quo” in the region.
Additionally, the recently concluded memorandum of understanding on bringing Indian workers to Taiwan was seen as a welcome step in boosting bilateral relations.
Modi also expressed his grief on the loss of life and property due to an earthquake in Taiwan.
Modi has also expressed sincere gratitude to President William Lai’s (賴清德) well wishes on X. Such bonhomie between the two sides is set to increase.
For Taiwan, the re-elected Modi government would provide consistency to bilateral ties. In states like Gujarat and Tamil Nadu where Taiwanese companies have invested significantly, the power equation remains unchanged, which brings stability to Taiwanese interests.
In the past, Taiwanese manufacturers have raised concerns about complicated rules in India, which present challenges to Taiwanese investment. Having a continuity government in India would assure Taiwanese investors.
Although India has not voiced support for Taiwan at the World Health Assembly, the inclusion of Taiwan in the India-colaunched Internal Solar Alliance is something to hope for. As Taiwan faces power crises each year, its inclusion in the grouping can lead to a free exchange of ideas and technology.
The increase in cooperation between the two on education has also been one of the strongest pillars of the relationship. With the increase of Taiwan Education Centers in India to 33, it has also helped in bridging ties from the bottom up.
Additionally, there have been visits by Indian high-school principals to Taiwan followed by online interactions between students, which has led to further understanding between the two cultures.
COVID-19 assistance from Taiwan, followed by the recent opening of a Taiwan Tourism Information Centre in India, and the planned opening of Taiwan’s representative office in Mumbai, which would provide ease of access to the Taiwanese and Indian business communities, are further examples that reflect growing nonpolitical ties which look set to continue.
However, although India and Taiwan have had the same party remain in power after their respective elections this year, challenges remain in furthering ties. Questionable remarks by former minister of labor Hsu Ming-chun (許銘春) in March about the government’s preference for certain Indian workers caused a significant stir, forcing her to apologize.
As foreign minister, Wu remained hopeful of securing a free-trade agreement with India, and it will be interesting to see how the new administrations in India and Taiwan work toward fulfilling this goal.
With the growing ties between the two, one cannot stop echoing Wu’s remarks: “to me, the world is divided into two types of people: those who are going to fall in love with India and those who already have. I believe you all know I fall in the latter camp.”
Manoj Kumar Panigrahi is an assistant professor at O.P. Jindal Global University’s Jindal School of International Affairs in India. He teaches courses on Taiwanese society and politics, and cross-strait affairs.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS