After seven long electoral phases that took place across India, the mother of elections in the world’s largest democracy ended on Sunday, with the results being declared on Tuesday. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, led by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and its coalition partners, the National Democratic Alliance, secured 292 seats, whereas the Indian National Congress and its multi-party Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance secured 234. The result was a reality check for the ruling party.
Several steps taken by the Modi government since 2014 have strengthened relations between India and Taiwan, although the former’s “one China” policy and the geopolitical situation do not allow it to recognize Taiwan as a country.
Though limited in political engagement, in the decade since 2014, when Modi became prime minister, and Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy was implemented by then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in 2016, nonpolitical ties between the two sides have increased significantly.
In Taiwan, multiple Indian events marking major festivals such as Diwali and Holi are also held, which then-minister of foreign affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) attended at India’s de facto embassy, the India Taipei Association.
Since 2020, there has been growing acceptance of Taiwan among Indian policymakers. In August 2022, when China launched military exercises around Taiwan, Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Arindam Bagchi expressed concerns about the unilateral attempt to change the “status quo” in the region.
Additionally, the recently concluded memorandum of understanding on bringing Indian workers to Taiwan was seen as a welcome step in boosting bilateral relations.
Modi also expressed his grief on the loss of life and property due to an earthquake in Taiwan.
Modi has also expressed sincere gratitude to President William Lai’s (賴清德) well wishes on X. Such bonhomie between the two sides is set to increase.
For Taiwan, the re-elected Modi government would provide consistency to bilateral ties. In states like Gujarat and Tamil Nadu where Taiwanese companies have invested significantly, the power equation remains unchanged, which brings stability to Taiwanese interests.
In the past, Taiwanese manufacturers have raised concerns about complicated rules in India, which present challenges to Taiwanese investment. Having a continuity government in India would assure Taiwanese investors.
Although India has not voiced support for Taiwan at the World Health Assembly, the inclusion of Taiwan in the India-colaunched Internal Solar Alliance is something to hope for. As Taiwan faces power crises each year, its inclusion in the grouping can lead to a free exchange of ideas and technology.
The increase in cooperation between the two on education has also been one of the strongest pillars of the relationship. With the increase of Taiwan Education Centers in India to 33, it has also helped in bridging ties from the bottom up.
Additionally, there have been visits by Indian high-school principals to Taiwan followed by online interactions between students, which has led to further understanding between the two cultures.
COVID-19 assistance from Taiwan, followed by the recent opening of a Taiwan Tourism Information Centre in India, and the planned opening of Taiwan’s representative office in Mumbai, which would provide ease of access to the Taiwanese and Indian business communities, are further examples that reflect growing nonpolitical ties which look set to continue.
However, although India and Taiwan have had the same party remain in power after their respective elections this year, challenges remain in furthering ties. Questionable remarks by former minister of labor Hsu Ming-chun (許銘春) in March about the government’s preference for certain Indian workers caused a significant stir, forcing her to apologize.
As foreign minister, Wu remained hopeful of securing a free-trade agreement with India, and it will be interesting to see how the new administrations in India and Taiwan work toward fulfilling this goal.
With the growing ties between the two, one cannot stop echoing Wu’s remarks: “to me, the world is divided into two types of people: those who are going to fall in love with India and those who already have. I believe you all know I fall in the latter camp.”
Manoj Kumar Panigrahi is an assistant professor at O.P. Jindal Global University’s Jindal School of International Affairs in India. He teaches courses on Taiwanese society and politics, and cross-strait affairs.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS